On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 12:49:54 + Peter Relson wrote:
:>As was alluded to, if it doesn't work when you "do that" (STIMERM WAIT), then
don't "do that".
:>If you want to be able to "communicate" then you wait on multiple ECBs and do
not use STIMERM WAIT, but use STIMERM with an exit that posts
As was alluded to, if it doesn't work when you "do that" (STIMERM WAIT), then
don't "do that".
If you want to be able to "communicate" then you wait on multiple ECBs and do
not use STIMERM WAIT, but use STIMERM with an exit that posts one of the ECBs.
The "communication" can be by posting one o
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:37:15 -0600 Paul Schuster
wrote:
:>How to handle this situation: task A attaches a subtask, task B.
:>The B task issues a STIMERM WAIT=YES
:>Task A terminates, but gets the A03 abend since task B still active.
:>How can task A communicate to the subtask B
t Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 2:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ATTACHX/STIMERM WAIT=YES
EXTERNAL EMAIL
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 19:37, Paul Schuster wrote:
> How to handle this si
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 19:37, Paul Schuster wrote:
> How to handle this situation: task ‘A’ attaches a subtask, task ‘B’.
>
> The ‘B’ task issues a STIMERM WAIT=YES
>
> Task ‘A’ terminates, but gets the A03 abend since task ‘B’ still active.
>
> How can task ‘A’ communicate to the subtask ‘B’ tha
Just off the top of my head from having a similar issue a few
years ago, you may need to be watching two ECBs (EVENTS). But I'm
not sure that the STIMERM won't cause a squawk when you have the
task end.
And I think you will have to pass the address of the ECB you will
POST for termination to
DETACH? Or do you need something less disruptive?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Schuster
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 7:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
