only released quarterly, whereas RSUs are released every month.
IBM's RSU (Recommended Service Update) is assigned like this:
IBM's monthly RSUs (RSUyy01, 02, 04, 05, 07, ...) identify PTFs that fix
HIPER, PE, Security/Integrity, or pervasive problems *AND* have
completed a 30 day CS
only released quarterly, whereas RSUs are released every month.
--
Andy Styles
Lloyds Banking Group plc. Registered Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ.
Registered in Scotland no. SC95000. Telephone: 0131 225 4555.
Lloyds Bank plc. Registered Office: 25 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7HN.
Re
On Wed, 29 May 2019 23:06:01 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>The advertised virtue of RSU is that it represents a well-defined bundle of
>fixes that have been tested together in 'many' shops.
Not exactly. It is a set of PTFs that have been extensively tested together by
IBM.
Then they have been
f Of
Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 5:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: RSUs
On 5/29/2019 3:57 AM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wrote:
>> Did you really get more PTFs assigned RSU1903 the second time? Or
>> did you simply get more
On 5/29/2019 3:57 AM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wrote:
Did you really get more PTFs assigned RSU1903 the second time? Or did you
simply get
more PTFs? Let me explain:
I believe we received new PTFs - with RSU1903 being assigned to them at the
same time. That's the behaviour I'm
Classification: Public
Hi Kurt,
> Did you really get more PTFs assigned RSU1903 the second time? Or did you
> simply get
> more PTFs? Let me explain:
I believe we received new PTFs - with RSU1903 being assigned to them at the
same time. That's the behaviour I'm querying - and I think you agr
On 5/28/2019 12:04 PM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wrote:
I've snipped a fair bit of this, but (and I've manually added quoting, so
apologies if it breaks):
Were any of these PTFs also received in the prior RECEIVE ORDER? And Were they
applied and
accepted, perhaps purging them fr
2019 9:04 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: RSUs
>
> Classification: Public
> Hi Kurt,
>
> I've snipped a fair bit of this, but (and I've manually added quoting, so
> apologies if it breaks):
>
> > Were any of these PTFs also receive
Classification: Public
Hi Kurt,
I've snipped a fair bit of this, but (and I've manually added quoting, so
apologies if it breaks):
> Were any of these PTFs also received in the prior RECEIVE ORDER? And Were
> they applied and
> accepted, perhaps purging them from the global zone prior to the
On 5/24/2019 11:24 AM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wrote:
I have the SMPGLOG (GLOBAL log), but not the jobs. I'm reluctant to post a
large amount of SMPLOG output here, but here (hopefully relevant) snippets:
RECEIVE
ORDER(ORDERSERVER(ORDRINFO)
CONTENT(RECOMMENDED
On 5/24/2019 10:19 AM, Jousma, David wrote:
Bob, I'm sure Kurt will give a more complete answer, but the RECEIVE ORDER
Process first uploads an inventory to IBM. Then the order process only sends
you what you don’t have.
In my opinion a more complete answer is not necessary. Your posts
de
Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 11:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
o steps be automatically
combined in a batch job and not use SHOPz at all?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 10:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
Bob, I'm
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: 24 May 2019 14:38
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
-- This email has reached the Bank via an external source --
On 5/23/2019 10:18 AM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wro
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 10:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
Bob, I'm sure Kurt will give a
On Fri, 24 May 2019 09:38:22 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
> If you did receive such ASSIGN statements,
>and if you still have it, I'd like to see the RECEIVE command output for
>both jobs please.
If he doesn't have the jobs, will the data from the SMPLOG for that period help?
--
Tom Marchant
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
Kurt,
Speaking of RSUs, is there a way to provide an inventory of PTFs already
received so that I don't end up reor
Kurt,
Speaking of RSUs, is there a way to provide an inventory of PTFs already
received so that I don't end up reordering and transmitting gigabytes of PTFs
that have already been ordered, downloaded and received? As it is now, I am
forced to run the RSU job on the weekend so that I
On 5/23/2019 10:18 AM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wrote:
We did a RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) in early April (just after the "New
Service Levels" email), and got a number of fixes for RSU1903. Over the last couple
of days, it's been discovered that we are missing a few PTFs t
On 5/23/2019 10:18 AM, Styles, Andy , ITS zPlatform Services wrote:
Classification: Public
Hi all,
A question on some behaviour that I think we've noticed over the last few RSUs
that have been announced.
We did a RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) in early April (just after the "Ne
Classification: Public
David,
Okay, that makes some sense, and perhaps is a better way of doing the receive,
which I'll perhaps adopt in the future; it still doesn't answer the question of
whether IBM retrospectively assign RSUs to PTFs.
Andy Styles
z/Series System Programmer
---
FO)
/* TRANSFERONLY <=== NOTE 5 */
CLIENT(CLNTINFO)
)
.
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Styles (ITS zPlatform Services)"
<00d68f765d25-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:38:07
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services)
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
Classificatio
A.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
-- This email has reached the Bank via an external source --
I order via shopz
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Styles (ITS zPlatform Services)"
<00d68f765d25-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
S
I order via shopz
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Styles (ITS zPlatform Services)"
<00d68f765d25-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:33:33 AM
Subject: Re: RSUs
Classification: Public
W
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: 23 May 2019 15:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSUs
-- This email has reached the Bank via an external source --
I don't recall ever doing a RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) , when I get an
email for new service levels, I orde
d25-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:17:25 AM
Subject: RSUs
Classification: Public
Hi all,
A question on some behaviour that I think we've noticed over the last few RSUs
that have been announced.
We did a RECEIVE ORDER
Classification: Public
Hi all,
A question on some behaviour that I think we've noticed over the last few RSUs
that have been announced.
We did a RECEIVE ORDER CONTENT(RECOMMENDED) in early April (just after the "New
Service Levels" email), and got a number of fixes for RSU1903
28 matches
Mail list logo
