Re: Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Seymour J Metz
gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Joseph Reichman Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 7:54 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Question on Wait macro Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of the

Re: Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Seymour J Metz
9:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Question on Wait macro It’s nothing in my code just maybe I have a misunderstanding it was my understanding That a wait suspends the RB not the entire TCB that documentation seems to say otherwise the entire TCB is suspended unless I didn’t read rig

Re: Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Well, the earlier RBs are already suspended. The unsatisfied WAIT places the task in the non-dispatchable status. It is possible to add an IRB to the task and the task would be dispatchable and the IRB would run. On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:07:18 -0400 Joseph Reichman wrote: :>It’s nothing in my cod

Re: Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
It’s nothing in my code just maybe I have a misunderstanding it was my understanding That a wait suspends the RB not the entire TCB that documentation seems to say otherwise the entire TCB is suspended unless I didn’t read right Thanks > On Apr 1, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Binyamin Dissen > wr

Re: Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Binyamin Dissen
What is your question? Show your code that is affected by the issue you perceive. On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:54:09 -0400 Joseph Reichman wrote: :>Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of the active task” I was under the impression that the task is active just the

Re: Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
I would think there is a new TCBRBP > On Apr 1, 2019, at 8:44 AM, Tom Marchant > <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > >> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:54:09 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >> >> Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of >> the

Re: Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Tom Marchant
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:54:09 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of >the active task” I was under the impression that the task is active just the >RB is suspended What do you think it would mean for the task to be active when

Question on Wait macro

2019-04-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Just looking at the documentation for the wait macro it says “performance of the active task” I was under the impression that the task is active just the RB is suspended Which is why it is place in bits 8 - 31 of the ECB Thanks -