On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, at 14:08, Parry, Gary (PERATON) wrote:
> Also, Teams popup
> notifications show in the far lower right corner of the display. That
> took some getting used to..
If the popup notifications are able to be moved once they pop up,
you could probably use something like AutoHotKe
orner of the display. That took some getting used to..
Regards,
Gary Parry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Beaver
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opinion
Does anyone have an opinion on
Thank you everyone for you feed back
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 1:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion
Chiming in to say that the big
Chiming in to say that the big screen consideration is a real (seeing the whole
screen without moving much) reason to want curved.
However, if you have 2 screens you can experiment with, just set them tilted in
and see if that works for you.
I'm assuming big, curved screens cost more, compared to
I have a 42 inch curved. The curved screen is very clear and everything is the
same size all the way from left to right. Previously I had a 42 in flat screen
(which I gave to my kid who loves it), but the problem I had was that as I age,
my eyesight isn't able to refocus as quickly so I had to
e
by side pointing straight ahead, or do you take the left and
right ones and turn them slightly towards you?
The larger the viewing area, the more the curved screen works for
you. So my opinion is, if you gots the $$$ get the curved screen.
Steve Thompson
On 1/15/2024 5:42 PM, Bob Bri
Monday, January 15, 2024 12:38
>
> I have not used that specific monitor, but I do use a curved monitor. Love
> it! For me, much better than a flat monitor. I was hooked after I tried the
> first one (a Samsung).
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Beaver
>
anuary 15, 2024 12:33 PM
>
> Does anyone have an opinion on LG - 49" IPS LED Curved UltraWide Dual QHD
144Hz FreeSync
> and G-SYNC Compatible Monitor with HDR (HDMI, DisplayPort, USB) - Black
--
For IBM-MAI
monitor once, I'd go curved every time the $$$ were
> available for such a device.
>
> Note: I have a 8' wide desk that is ~3' "deep". So a 43" monitor
> sits on the back edge of the desk, center. I sometimes have to
> move my chair left-right becau
monitor once, I'd go curved every time the $$$ were
> available for such a device.
>
> Note: I have a 8' wide desk that is ~3' "deep". So a 43" monitor
> sits on the back edge of the desk, center. I sometimes have to
> move my chair left-right because of th
he back edge of the desk, center. I sometimes have to
move my chair left-right because of the lack of curvature. So my
opinion is, for that wide, curved is best.
Generally, because of work I've done, two of these wide curved
monitors side by side is better than 1 43" and 3 30-ish inch
monito
Dell 4919dw has served me well for 4 years
Matt Hogstrom
PGP key 0F143BC1
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 13:28, Joe Monk wrote:
>
> Second this. I have a DELL 42" monitor which I used with multiple computers.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscrib
putation merely what others think you are.” - - - John Wooden
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Bill Hitefield
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 11:38 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Opinion
>
> Steve,
>
>
> > Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
> >
> > “Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what
> > you are, reputation merely what others think you are.” - - - John
> Wooden
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM M
ion List On Behalf
> Of Bill Hitefield
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 11:38 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Opinion
>
> Steve,
>
> I have not used that specific monitor, but I do use a curved monitor. Love
> it! For me, much better than a flat monitor. I was ho
IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Hitefield
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 11:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion
Steve,
I have not used that specific monitor, but I do use a curved monitor. Love it!
For me, much better than a flat monitor. I was hooked aft
ve Beaver
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 12:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Opinion
>
> Does anyone have an opinion on
>
>
>
> LG - 49" IPS LED Curved UltraWide Dual QHD 144Hz FreeSync and G-SYNC
> Compatible Monitor with HDR (HDMI, DisplayPort
Does anyone have an opinion on
LG - 49" IPS LED Curved UltraWide Dual QHD 144Hz FreeSync and G-SYNC
Compatible Monitor with HDR (HDMI, DisplayPort, USB) - Black
Steve Beaver
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / si
Those are...odd. But thanks, also fun!
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 8:14 PM Mark Regan wrote:
>
> https://www.npr.org/2022/01/22/1074964815/opinion-sea-shanties-written-for-the-digital-age
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Regan, K8MTR General, EN80tg
> CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1
https://www.npr.org/2022/01/22/1074964815/opinion-sea-shanties-written-for-the-digital-age
Regards,
Mark Regan, K8MTR General, EN80tg
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017
z/OS Network Software Consultant (z NetView, z/OS Communications Server)
Contractor
[Default] On 18 May 2021 17:15:54 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
ponce...@bcs.org.uk (CM Poncelet) wrote:
>With all due respect, anyone who has difficulty coding JCL COND=
>statements should consider *not* working with IBM mainframe systems.
as someone who had to play cute games with COND= I wou
/19
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27023829
Product Documentation
Abstract
: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
Importance: High
Has anyone had training for the IBM SFG Product?
If so, could you please provide the name of the 3rd Party Vendor who provided
the training?
Also, where can I find SFG Documentation/User Guide/etc.?
Thank You!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator
Gen
- Your Opinion
Importance: High
I just checked, we are now at Version 5.2.
Thank You!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144
Phone: (518) 257-4209
Cell: (518) 894-0879
Fax: (518) 257-4300
len.sa...@gdit.com
URL: www.gdit.com
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Beaver
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
Len you will need to move to CD 5.2
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for the finger checks
> On Jul 25, 2019, at 08:50, Sasso, Len wr
len.sa...@gdit.com
> URL: www.gdit.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jackson, Rob
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 3:39 PM
> To: Sasso, Len
> Subject: RE: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
>
> Good luck, Len! If you ever need a shoulder to cry on . . . . :)
>
12144
Phone: (518) 257-4209
Cell: (518) 894-0879
Fax: (518) 257-4300
len.sa...@gdit.com
URL: www.gdit.com
-Original Message-
From: Jackson, Rob
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 3:39 PM
To: Sasso, Len
Subject: RE: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
Good luck, Len! If you ever need a shoulder to cry on
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kirk Wolf
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
IBM z/OS OpenSSH is included with z/OS, and it includes SFTP.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Techologies
http://dovetail.com
PS> if you nee
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kirk Wolf
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
[External Email]
IBM z/OS OpenSSH is included with z/OS, and it includes SFTP.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Techologies
http://dovetail.com
PS>
IBM z/OS OpenSSH is included with z/OS, and it includes SFTP.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Techologies
http://dovetail.com
PS> if you need z/OS data sets, spool files, etc, etc, you can also use
Co:Z SFTP, which does SMF, console notification logging, exits, etc, etc.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:32 PM Sass
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
It's extremely powerful but oh so onerous to install, maintain, and administer.
They will push implementation services, and you will wish you'd bought them
before it's over if you go it on your own.
What are you planning on
It's extremely powerful but oh so onerous to install, maintain, and administer.
They will push implementation services, and you will wish you'd bought them
before it's over if you go it on your own.
What are you planning on doing with it? If it is just MFT, I would highly
recommend taking a g
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
SFG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sasso, Len
Sent: Thursday, March
SFG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sasso, Len
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
Importance: High
I welcome your comments, suggestions, etc. about the IBM SFG Product.
Thank You
I welcome your comments, suggestions, etc. about the IBM SFG Product.
Thank You!
Len Sasso
System Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144
Phone: (518) 257-4209
Cell: (518) 894-0879
Fax: (518) 257-4300
len.sa...@gdit.com
URL: www.gdit.com
This
IMHO, rap "music" is _NOT_ music. But highly indicative of what the coming
generations will be like.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, at 2:15 PM, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
> It's amost Friday, right. At least here in Zurich
> >Rap music is performed by those that can not sing so others can not think.
>
>
> ra
.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform
program design)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiRMGYQfXrs
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:23 AM Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek
ject: [EXTERNAL] Re: OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform
> program design)
>
> IMHO, Rammstein should only be listened to in German! They are one of
> the only German bands that have had mainstream commercial success in
> English speaking countries
> singing in their
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 7:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform program
design)
IMHO, Rammstein should only be listened to in German! They are one of
the only German ba
I love the song and remembered some of the
translation.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 10:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-pla
I love the song and remembered some of the
translation.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 10:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-pl
Savor
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ron hawkins
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2018 3:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform program design)
You have asked me and I have
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David Crayford
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform program
design)
On 9/06/2018 7:03 AM, Ron hawkins wrote:
You have asked me and I have said not
You have asked me and I have said nothing.
>From Du Hast - Rammstein.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David Crayford
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: mu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform program
design)
Rammstein
Thanks,
Tom Savor
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2018 12:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
You have asked me and I have said nothing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform program
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:49 PM Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
> >You missed REXX/CICS. Am I the only person who uses this variant?
>
> John McKown wrote:
> >I don't have that product and so cannot code for it.
>
> You have it if you have CICS Transaction Server for z/OS, which
Odd thing about CICS people is that they don't install REXX/CICS when it's
basically *free* with CICS.
The DB2 interface is simple, CICS commands and CICS APIs are a snap. It can
read and write a PDS or flat file. TSQ browse/write/delete is simple and it
has a full screen interface similar to ISPF
Rammstein
Thanks,
Tom Savor
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2018 12:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OT: Rap music (was Re: opinion: multi-platform program design
Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>You missed REXX/CICS. Am I the only person who uses this variant?
John McKown wrote:
>I don't have that product and so cannot code for it.
You have it if you have CICS Transaction Server for z/OS, which includes
the functions that were previously in the CICS REXX Runtime
On 8/06/2018 3:15 AM, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
It's amost Friday, right. At least here in Zurich
Rap music is performed by those that can not sing so others can not think.
rap music? Isn't this a contradiction in terms ;-)
What do you listen to, Beethoven? Ramstein? :)
Apologies to all the
I've determined that rap music is very boring, to me anyway.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:15 PM Peter Hunkeler wrote:
> It's amost Friday, right. At least here in Zurich
> >Rap music is performed by those that can not sing so others can not
> think.
>
>
> rap music? Isn't this a contradiction in te
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:17 PM Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
> You missed REXX/CICS. Am I the only person who uses this variant?
>
I don't have that product and so cannot code for it.
--
Rap music is performed by those that can not sing so others can not think.
Maranatha! <><
John McKown
--
une 7, 2018 2:21 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: opinion: multi-platform program design
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:21 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> > ISPF
> >
>
> Ah, yes, I guess you mean using ISPF display services to get input,
> disp
It's amost Friday, right. At least here in Zurich
>Rap music is performed by those that can not sing so others can not think.
rap music? Isn't this a contradiction in terms ;-)
Apologies to all the rappers out there, and the ones who like that
contradiction, ahem.. music. No offense intended.
metz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John McKown
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 2:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: opinion: multi-platform program design
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:21 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> ISPF
>
Ah, yes, I guess you
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:21 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> ISPF
>
Ah, yes, I guess you mean using ISPF display services to get input,
display output, and possibly update ISPF variables rather that TSO
CLIST/REXX variables.
>
> NETVIEW
>
Unfortunately, I know nothing about NETVIEW because I'v
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:27:26 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>...
>2) REXX via IRXJCL - "pure" non-TSO REXX
>6) REXX under UNIX - program invoked with a UNIX shell script written in REXX
>
It's a shame that UNIX directories are not supported in SYSEXEC concatenation.
I do it anyway to a
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:27:26 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>I've already written a utility program which is designed to run as a UNIX
>command, mainly interactively from a UNIX shell, but it works from TSO
>OSHELL and in batch via BPXBATCH or Co:Z launcher just fine. So, from a
>"practical" viewpoint t
ISPF
NETVIEW
System REXX
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John McKown
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: opinion: multi-platform
I've already written a utility program which is designed to run as a UNIX
command, mainly interactively from a UNIX shell, but it works from TSO
OSHELL and in batch via BPXBATCH or Co:Z launcher just fine. So, from a
"practical" viewpoint the following is not really necessary.
But I am considering
Sure does,
Threading in C easier in some sense than Assembler attaches, I an in this
situation now.
Write and attach routine or write in C , actually convert to C.
Scott
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:17 PM Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
>
> > If, on the other hand, you call C/C++
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
If, on the other hand, you call C/C++ runtime library routines, the final code
is not located via LOAD, but via some table with entry point addresses
Makes sense. So write a one-liner wrapper for the library routine and compile
it into your own little library.
--
Jack
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:44:44 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>Sorry for the late reply. I've been trying to find the documentation that
>talks about calling C/C++ library functions from other HLL code, such as
>Cobol. All I found was ...
>
Nearly a half-century ago, when I had no experience with OS
>What's the difference between calling C/C++ runtime library functions and your
>own library functions? There's no difference in the C/C++ languages per se.
Well, for the topic at hand, there is, I think.
If you code your own C/C++, the compiler generates the code, and it includes
the C/C++
routines are where the cross-linkage exists, not between the stubs.
Now, whether C library routines or even their stubs should be coded to ASSUME
static linking is a different question. I would argue that any good library
routine design should ASSUME dynamic calling from the start, but that is jus
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
>> All I found was information about doing interlanguage calls, but this
>> is all about "own" code, not the functions that the C/C++ runtime library
>> provides.
>>
>
>
> What's the difference between calling C/C++
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
All I found was information about doing interlanguage calls, but this is all about
"own" code, not the functions that the C/C++ runtime library provides.
What's the difference between calling C/C++ runtime library functions and your own library functions? There's no
d
Sorry for the late reply. I've been trying to find the documentation that talks
about calling C/C++ library functions from other HLL code, such as Cobol. All I
found was information about doing interlanguage calls, but this is all about
"own" code, not the functions that the C/C++ runtime librar
Good information to know! Thanks!!
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 12:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
Subseq
to do our job! TMTOWTDI even if not using Perl.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "sta
TOP RUN.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 12:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "s
, 2017 12:19 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
>
>
>
> > The S0C1 is because SYS1.SCEELKED isn’t available for the dynamic calls.
>
>
>
> SCEELKED is intended to be used at linkedit/binder/
Are all z/OS XL C/C++ RTL modules just stubs line this? Or is it just some.?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 12:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "standard li
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Bill Woodger wrote:
> I'm interested in how people deal with the case of the functions and what
> type of executables people create.
>
> Relevant is discussion of overflow. By Standard fine for COBOL, not fine
> for C.
>
> sprintf is fun but do I want to interpret
I'm interested in how people deal with the case of the functions and what type
of executables people create.
Relevant is discussion of overflow. By Standard fine for COBOL, not fine for C.
sprintf is fun but do I want to interpret a string 4m times to produce a report?
> The S0C1 is because SYS1.SCEELKED isn’t available for the dynamic calls.
SCEELKED is intended to be used at linkedit/binder/ time, not execution time.
What is statically linked is not the code for the C function, but only a little
stub which finds the way to the code at runtime. In the cas
HTH and many thanks for all the new ideas you have put into my head!
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 5:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:33:07 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>Perhaps there is a way to use another codepage. It's been a while since I
>wrote the program and did my testing. Specifying codepage(1047) makes it work
>and I haven't looked any further.
>
It would seem that if there is an option to s
Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 4:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:29:31 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>I have been successful in in
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:29:31 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>I have been successful in invoking the following "regular expression"
>functions from the z/OS XL C/C++ Runtime Library: regcomp(), regexec and
>regfree().
>
>
>Just to see if I could do it. Not to actually use for anything useful.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 <
peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> Not "nutso" at all, just very cool.
>
> I notice you are using "static" calls (quoted literal program names) in
> upper case. Does that mean that you statically link the C subroutines with
> you
ns.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
This is just a curiosit
: Thursday, April 6, 2017 12:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
The COBOL 20xx standard(s) do have some better support for COBOL calling to C,
but it's still not too hard with the current Enterprise COBOL. For
ame Discussion List on behalf of
Bernd Oppolzer
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 12:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
Topic drift:
This is somehow easy from PL/1, for some reasons:
a) parameters to external functions c
because of the use of
brackets ([]).
Frank
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
John McKown
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
This is just
McKown
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Opinion: Using C "standard library" routines in COBOL.
This is just a curiosity poll on my part. I'm wondering if anyone out there has
ever really used any C standard library routines (versus user wri
Topic drift:
This is somehow easy from PL/1, for some reasons:
a) parameters to external functions can be defined in PL/1 to be
passed using NODESCRIPTOR and BYVALUE, so that the mechanisms
perfectly match the C mechanisms
b) PL/1 has a datatype CHAR (x) VARYINGZ (no typo), which means:
variabl
This is just a curiosity poll on my part. I'm wondering if anyone out there
has ever really used any C standard library routines (versus user written
code) in a COBOL program. I know that many may wonder "Why? What do I get
out of it." IMO, there are some useful routines in the standard C library
w
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za (Elardus Engelbrecht) writes:
> I vaguely remember that I worked [indirectly] with them when I started
> worked around 1989.
>
> ICL [from Britain?] and Amdahl [from that wizard Gene Amdahl] were
> guzzled up by Fujitsu.
Fujitsu was major manufacture and investor in
Charles Mills wrote:
>> Did you check glassdoor.com?
Interesting. My eyes are glassy... ;-)
Overall average score for Fujitsu as employer is just average, say 2.7 out of
5. But then the score is based on that part of Fujitsu they're referring.
John McKown wrote:
>Didn't show up in my Google
ger (yes, he knows I'm looking) has a
positive overall opinion of them. Which is a big plus.
--
How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb? One to hold the
griffon and one to fill the bathtub with brightly colore
Did you check glassdoor.com?
CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity
Original message
From: John McKown
Date: 04/08/2016 8:56 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: opinion? Fujitsu USA
As you may, or may not, remember, my company is
. Just got a call setting up a phone interview. I've started doing web
searches just to become familiar with the company. So far, looks decent.
And much more advanced than where I am now (should I admit that?).
Anyway, anybody have any opinion they'd like to share. If you don't want t
Rick,
Also take into account the type of person doing the design some ppl are
'part to whole' others are 'whole to part'.
Like John, I have been thinking about some tool, i work for a Identity
Management Software company, so my thoughts
are want is needed or wanted in RACF or ACF2 or Top-Secret ar
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Rick Troth wrote:
> Do a little googling on the license question. I can't think of any
> problems from going with the MIT license, but IANAL.
>
>
> On 03/28/16 10:25, John McKown wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Anyway, I'm still thinking of how it will be designed. But I am
Do a little googling on the license question. I can't think of any
problems from going with the MIT license, but IANAL.
On 03/28/16 10:25, John McKown wrote:
...
Anyway, I'm still thinking of how it will be designed. But I am curious if
the requirement of z/OS 2.1 would make it unusable to a
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:38:10 -0500, Tom Marchant
wrote:
>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:25:03 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>>It will be
>>developed, probably slowly, on a friend's z/OS 2.2 system. The application
>>will use facilities which only exist on z/OS 2.1 and above.
>
>>I am curious if
>>the requ
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:25:03 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>It will be
>developed, probably slowly, on a friend's z/OS 2.2 system. The application
>will use facilities which only exist on z/OS 2.1 and above.
>I am curious if
>the requirement of z/OS 2.1 would make it unusable to a lot of people here.
I am seriously starting to think about a "learning" project. That is, this
will be done on my own time, not using company resources. It will be
developed, probably slowly, on a friend's z/OS 2.2 system. The application
will use facilities which only exist on z/OS 2.1 and above. In particular,
the J
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
