I wondered if the keyword update would affect intrinsic functions. Thanks
again for the info!
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Timothy Sipples
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 8:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF and newer COBOL
Frank, you'll probably need the PTF(s) for APAR OA56161 in addition to APAR
OA55117. (Thank you, Alan.)
Presumably these updates will all be rolled up into z/OS 2.4, so that's
another option when available.
--
Subject: Re: ISPF and newer COBOL keywords
A quick update: Mike Stayton alerted me that ISPF was updated about 12
months ago with HILITE-related support for Enterprise COBOL through and
including Enterprise COBOL 6.2. Please refer to the PTF(s) for APAR
OA55117.
It'd be great to read repor
A quick update: Mike Stayton alerted me that ISPF was updated about 12
months ago with HILITE-related support for Enterprise COBOL through and
including Enterprise COBOL 6.2. Please refer to the PTF(s) for APAR
OA55117.
It'd be great to read reports of experiences with this ISPF update.
Thanks, M
It's certainly possible to create your own custom browsers and editor
behaviors (with custom highlighting) in ISPF, and that's pretty well
documented in the ISPF sections of the z/OS Knowledge Center.
Past IBM practice was to roll up additional COBOL reserved word
highlighting into ISPF in some la
Since Enterprise COBOL V5.1, IBM has been adding new COBOL language features
with each release (and sometimes within a single "release"). On our system, at
least, the ISPF "HILITE COBOL" Color Settings feature has not been keeping up.
The new "inline comment" indicator that was added with V5.1