Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

In , on 07/15/2015 at 08:04 AM, Steve Coalbran said: >Can you be more specific. Yes. >I tried... TSO GTTERM GTTERM is a macro, not a command. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see We don't care. We don't

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Think I just searched 'IBM SNA GTTERM' Lots of hits. Maybe most educational: www.prycroft6.com.au/misc/3270eds.html In a message dated 7/15/2015 5:14:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time, john.archie.mck...@gmail.com writes: GTTERM is an assembler macro for use in your own program. On Jul 1

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

)" > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 2015-06-14 23:16 > Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & > Monitoring) > Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > > > In > , > on 06/13/2015 >at 10:22 AM, St

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Thanks. Can you be more specific. I tried... TSO GTTERM and COMMAND GTTERM NOT FOUND *** From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 2015-06-14 23:16 Subject:Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Sent

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote: > In > , > on 06/13/2015 >at 09:51 PM, John McKown said: > > >ooRexx was an option, > > For a simple report, yes, but I keep running into situations when I > want regexen, modules from CPAN or both

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

In , on 06/13/2015 at 09:51 PM, John McKown said: >ooRexx was an option, For a simple report, yes, but I keep running into situations when I want regexen, modules from CPAN or both. Is there an OOREXX intergace to PCRE or equivaelent? Can it handle named cptures? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

In , on 06/13/2015 at 10:22 AM, Steve Coalbran said: >1. What's a CV (apart from what I need for my next job!)? SNA Control Vector. >2. Whatever address I need, how do I get it? GTTERM -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

On Jun 13, 2015 8:27 PM, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote: > > In > , > on 06/12/2015 >at 11:54 AM, John McKown said: > > >I could do it faster in Perl than my manager > >could using MS-Excel. > > That depends on what "it" is. There are some things that are much

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

In , on 06/12/2015 at 11:54 AM, John McKown said: >I could do it faster in Perl than my manager >could using MS-Excel. That depends on what "it" is. There are some things that are much easier than a spreadsheet, although excel is not my SS of choice. OTOH, as a REXX bigot[1] I am appalled at

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Of Steve Coalbran Sent: 13 June 2015 09:23 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Sorry, don't quite understand what you're saying. 1. What's a CV (apart from what I need for my next job!)? 2. Whatever ad

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

TSERV.UA.EDU Date: 2015-06-13 01:15 Subject:Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List In , on 06/12/2015 at 03:02 PM, Steve Coalbran said: >Thanks Lizette, >I have played with WSA but not for som

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

In , on 06/12/2015 at 03:02 PM, Steve Coalbran said: >Thanks Lizette, >I have played with WSA but not for some time. >I had to stop when I found Customers whose servers are behind: >LDAP+Citrix+TPX, etc... don't seem to have a locatable IPADDR. 1. TSO stores the IP address if the right CV i

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

In <003001d0a50d$5ff67690$1fe363b0$@mcn.org>, on 06/12/2015 at 05:43 AM, Charles Mills said: >IBM never documented the IND$FILE protocol either. The added information to 3270 Data streams. t may not be the comprehensive documentation that we want, but it is documentation. -- Shmuel (S

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

In , on 06/11/2015 at 02:58 PM, John McKown said: >'m a tad confused by this statement. The fact that you are running in a 3270 dession does not take away TSO commands. In particular, it doesn't take away FTP. >The only file transfer that I am aware of over a 3270 data stream The fact that

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

I of course meant it as a total compliment.  CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity Original message From: John McKown Date: 06/12/2015 5:57 AM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring On Fri, Ju

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Gross, Randall [PRI-1PP] < randy.gr...@primerica.com> wrote: > I'm a Tux fan myself, but just at home & just for fun...unfortunately > > ​My use is mainly for fun. But a few years ago, with a different CIO, I was able to convince the Ops manager (in charge of desk

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

ion Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Gross, Randall [PRI-1PP] < randy.gr...@primerica.com> wrote: > John, are you Win7 Pro or Home? > > Pro has the old XP support & Home doesn't... > > ​Window 7 Professional Ser

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

you'll get it! > > http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html > > > > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:01:20 +0000 > > From: randy.gr...@primerica.com > > Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & > Monitoring) > >

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Thanks Dave, I will try downloading at z/OS 2.1 and retry my scenarios. It may make a difference here? Who knows? /Steve From: Dave Salt To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 2015-06-12 17:24 Subject:Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Sen

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

it; you'll get it! http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:01:20 + > From: randy.gr...@primerica.com > Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > John,

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Gross, Randall [PRI-1PP] < randy.gr...@primerica.com> wrote: > John, are you Win7 Pro or Home? > > Pro has the old XP support & Home doesn't... > > ​Window 7 Professional Service Pack 1, 64 bit. This is my computer at work. I am a local admin on the box.​ I am n

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

to find the IP address in > these cases?!?! :-/ De! > /Steve > > > > From: John Abell > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Date: 2015-06-12 15:26 > Subject:Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & > Monitoring) > Sent

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Which version of z/OS? Maybe the later versions support Windows 7 where the 1.12 version doesn't? The message I get talks about 64 bit vs. 32 bit. I only see one Windows client: ISPGUINX. I did a BINary download on it, and tr

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

2, 2015 10:33 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & > Monitoring) > > Well, the version on my z/OS 1.12 system refuses to install on my Windows 7 > x86_64 desktop. Curiously, it does seem to work on my Linux Fe

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Well, the version on my z/OS 1.12 system refuses to install on my Windows 7 x86_64 desktop. Curiously, it does seem to work on my Linux Fedora 22 x86_64 under wine32. So I tried it. In GUI mode, it stinks. But in non-GUI mode, the file tran

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Well, the version on my z/OS 1.12 system refuses to install on my Windows 7 x86_64 desktop. Curiously, it does seem to work on my Linux Fedora 22 x86_64 under wine32. So I tried it. In GUI mode, it stinks. But in non-GUI mode, the file transfer is, well, OK. Personally, I prefer using Co:Z data set

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List Interesting toy although much much slower than an already in-place FTP of members. It seems to me there were other products similar to this in the past tha

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

harles > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > > Behalf Of John McKown > > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:27 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log &

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Coalbran Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 9:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Hi John, What is this of which you s

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

tup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List Interesting toy although much much slower than an already in-place FTP of members. It seems to me there were other products similar to this in the past that may or may not have been free. John T. Ab

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring) This is a good article on setting up the ISPF Workstation on your PC http://www.tsotimes.com/articles/arc

Re: ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

t that does not seem to be the one that's wanted... and did not work in this case (for me, then, anyhow). Any advice? /Steve "Tried it, didn't get it" :-) From: Lizette Koehler To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 2015-06-12 14:30 Subject: ISPF Workstation

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

ing".​ > > Charles > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:27 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Moni

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > I have never used it. Others? Is it a "popular" solution? > ​It ain't nun too popular with this-here Linux user (slipping into Texan spe

ISPF Workstation Setup ( Was: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring)

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:21 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring > > I have never used it. Others? Is it a "popular" solution? > > Charles > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > I have never used it. Others? Is it a "popular" solution? > ​It ain't nun too popular with this-here Linux user (slipping into Texan speak).​ I wish that IBM would document the protocol so that others could use it as a generic(?) interface.

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

I have never used it. Others? Is it a "popular" solution? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IND$FILE Re

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:01:22 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >FTP transfers are well-auditable via SMF 118/119, unlike IND$FILE. >This list of things it won't catch is, after all, nearly infinite. One that I didn't see in this thread is the use of the ISPF Workstation Agent. It is my tool of choic

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

In , on 06/11/2015 at 02:08 PM, John McKown said: > Note that it does not _require_ APF authorization to run. You can >get the logging only by simply linking it into a STEPLIB in a special >TSO logon proc. Why not use any of the supported methods for getting a dynamic TASKLIB? -- Shmu

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

In , on 06/11/2015 at 01:31 PM, John McKown said: >The IBM IND$FILE function basically runs a TSO command from the >READY prompt. IM has never supported INF$FILE from the READY prompt, only from applications with supported file transfer using it. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

It was the TV show. - -teD -   Original Message   From: Tony's Outlook via Mozilla Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 22:11 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring Not wishing to be a Black Hat and not wanting to t

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

Thanks everyone for all of your comments. Let me try to address everything at once so as to avoid mailbox clutter. @John McKown: Yes, to be able to read is ultimately to be able to steal, but we want to make it harder for the bad guys. The example I use in presentations is the person who has ac

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Walt Farrell wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:16:49 -0400, Ed Finnell wrote: > > >Several of the 3270 emulators had a user option for transfer mechanism > >IND$FILE or FTP. Some had better implementations that others. > > And the OP should be aware that it is theo

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:16:49 -0400, Ed Finnell wrote: >Several of the 3270 emulators had a user option for transfer mechanism >IND$FILE or FTP. Some had better implementations that others. And the OP should be aware that it is theoretically possible for a TSO user to write his own program (or

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Bob Rutledge wrote: > On 6/11/2015 3:58 PM, John McKown wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < >> shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote: >> > ... > >> That won't catch file transfers from an FTP command in a 3270 session. >>> >>> >> ​

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

Several of the 3270 emulators had a user option for transfer mechanism IND$FILE or FTP. Some had better implementations that others. In a message dated 6/11/2015 2:58:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time, john.archie.mck...@gmail.com writes: ​I'm a tad confused by this statement. The only file t

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On 6/11/2015 3:58 PM, John McKown wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote: ... That won't catch file transfers from an FTP command in a 3270 session. ​I'm a tad confused by this statement. The only file transfer that I am aware of

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote: > In , on 06/11/2015 >at 12:20 PM, Carlos Cordero said: > > >What I specifically searching for is to detect the file transfer > >activity executed from commands given on emulators. > > That won't c

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

In , on 06/11/2015 at 12:20 PM, Carlos Cordero said: >What I specifically searching for is to detect the file transfer >activity executed from commands given on emulators. That won't catch file transfers from an FTP command in a 3270 session. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and J

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

What about ftp? - -teD -   Original Message   From: Carlos Cordero Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 15:06 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring Mr. Kolusu, thanks for the info, I will check Regards > Date: Thu,

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Carlos Cordero wrote: > John, I very appreciate your help. > > If you´re available to share with me your code, ok I can put this on > development environment and customize it and testing. > ​The _code_ is available. I'm not. (man am I picky about words!) You, and

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

John, I very appreciate your help. If you´re available to share with me your code, ok I can put this on development environment and customize it and testing. I´m in touch. > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:31:47 -0500 > From: john.archie.mck...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: IND$FILE

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

rame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Carlos Cordero Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring Colleagues, Did somebody has implemented a process for monitor/log IND$FILE command activi

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Carlos Cordero wrote: > Colleagues, > > Did somebody has implemented a process for monitor/log IND$FILE command > activity focussed on file transmission thru 3270 emulators?, maybe with > beta88 software? > > Or it must a home-made ad-hoc customization outside o

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Tony's Outlook via Mozilla < tbabo...@outlook.com> wrote: > Not wishing to be a Black Hat and not wanting to think like a White Hat, > let me don my Gray Hat. If I wanted to send a PDS member containing source > code I'd simply email it. If it were large I'd mail

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Carlos Cordero wrote: > Both.. > ​I have some code with I can share which _might_ be of some help. But it may (most likely _will_) violate your shop's standards. Or cause your boss to say "no". The IBM IND$FILE function basically runs a TSO command​ from the READ

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

Mr. Kolusu, thanks for the info, I will check Regards > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:20:39 -0700 > From: skol...@us.ibm.com > Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Carlos, > > Here is a link to a previous discussion on

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

Not wishing to be a Black Hat and not wanting to think like a White Hat, let me don my Gray Hat. If I wanted to send a PDS member containing source code I'd simply email it. If it were large I'd mail it in pieces. In the movie Mash, Corporal Radar O'Reilly send a Jeep from Korea to his home

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

UA.EDU > Date: 06/11/2015 11:03 AM > Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > Both.. > > > Thanks > > > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:58:12 -0700 > > From: stars...@mindspring.com > > Subject:

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

Both.. Thanks > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:58:12 -0700 > From: stars...@mindspring.com > Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Are you looking for REAL time or after the fact monitoring? > > Lizette > > &g

Re: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

Are you looking for REAL time or after the fact monitoring? Lizette -Original Message- >From: Carlos Cordero >Sent: Jun 11, 2015 10:20 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring > >Colleagues, > >Did somebody has implement

IND$FILE Resource Log & Monitoring

Colleagues, Did somebody has implemented a process for monitor/log IND$FILE command activity focussed on file transmission thru 3270 emulators?, maybe with beta88 software? Or it must a home-made ad-hoc customization outside of beta88 software? What I specifically searching for is to detec