bject: Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:23:51 +1100, Attila Fogarasi
wrote abour Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools:
> There is a 64-bit ODBC driver so Db2 does provide a 64 bit API today, just
> not for embedded SQL :)
The ODBC driver
In article <02331572-ae6a-e896-0023-9bd6e64cf...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:23:51 +1100, Attila Fogarasi
> wrote abour Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools:
> > There is a 64-bit ODBC driver so Db2 does provide a 64 bit API today, just
> &
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:23:51 +1100, Attila Fogarasi
wrote abour Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools:
> There is a 64-bit ODBC driver so Db2 does provide a 64 bit API today, just
> not for embedded SQL :)
The ODBC driver runs on the client machine, not the host. The host
int
There is a 64-bit ODBC driver so Db2 does provide a 64 bit API today, just
not for embedded SQL :)
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 7:10 AM Don Poitras <
028977cc0221-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> In article <
> bn7pr10mb2546b7200578531cb1734e24f3...@bn7pr10mb2546.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
>
Tom Savor wrote:
>For us, the programs that run in Batch and Online are DB2 i/o
>programs. So your solution wont work for us as SQL and LP(64)
>are in-compatible.
Don Poitras wrote:
>There is a painful work-around. Use an assembler stub to call the DB2
>API in amode 31. Allocate all storage that
In article
you wrote:
> >So what can you do *today* if you have an immediate requirement for an AMODE
> >64 COBOL program per Tom Savor's comment, a program that must run both in
> >CICS >Transaction Server for z/OS and in non-CICS batch mode? Tom Marchant
> >provides one answer that works to
>So what can you do *today* if you have an immediate requirement for an AMODE
>64 COBOL program per Tom Savor's comment, a program that must run both in CICS
>>Transaction Server for z/OS and in non-CICS batch mode? Tom Marchant provides
>one answer that works today and is fully IBM supported:
>
Tom Savor wrote:
>If I read the Manual correctly, only Batch is 64-bit supported.
>CICS is not 64-bit supported. I have many DB2 programs that run
>Batch and Online, so I guess they will have to be forced to run
>as 31-bit.
Tom Marchant wrote:
>The bottom line is that you can't use 64-bit Cobo
Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2020 12:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools
If I read the Manual correctly, only Batch is 64-bit supported. CICS is not
64-bit supported.
I have many DB2 programs that run Batch and
STSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools
>
> ⚠ EXTERNAL MESSAGE – Think Before You Click
>
>
>
>A wild guess is that a debugger will need significant upgrades to support
>64-bit st
Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2019 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools
⚠ EXTERNAL MESSAGE – Think Before You Click
A wild guess is that a debugger will need significant upgrades to support
64-bit storage, a key
, December 24, 2019 11:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools
I will try that. Thanks!
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: T
I will try that. Thanks!
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2019 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Prog
Have you tried this; (From the announcement letter)
Optional licensed programs
Depending on the functions used you many require other software products such
as CICS, Db2, or IMS. For a list of compatible software, see the Software
Products Compatibility Reports (SPCR) site. From the SPCR site,
Has anyone out there used the IBM programmer tools such as IBM Debugger and IBM
Fault Analyzer with Enterprise COBOL V6.3? I am wondering if we need to
upgrade these tools in order to use some of the new features of COBOL V6.3
(specifically dynamic length strings and Unicode fields).
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
