lf of
Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
It could have been hardware related based on clock speed on early machines.
Perhaps it's more appropriate ask this on the RACF grou
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
EXTERNAL
Well, if that represents 24 hours then 2555 is 1 second.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:09 AM Lindy Mayfield wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that address spaces can be made exempt from 522 timeouts if
> t
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
EXTERNAL
Hi,
I think you gave the main answer
TIME=1440 (or NOLIMIT) on JCL.
AFAIK, there're monitor product (like BMC SYSPROG Services for instance) that
can update the value on the fly.
Regards.
Max
Not funny. ☹
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Beaver
Sent: torstai 26. syyskuuta 2019 18.05
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
EXTERNAL
Talk to your MVS people
-Original Message
Hi,
I think you gave the main answer
TIME=1440 (or NOLIMIT) on JCL.
AFAIK, there're monitor product (like BMC SYSPROG Services for instance)
that can update the value on the fly.
Regards.
Max
Il giorno mar 17 set 2019 alle ore 15:09 Lindy Mayfield <
lindy.mayfi...@sas.com> ha scritto:
>
Talk to your MVS people
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
It could have
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
EXTERNAL
Well, if that represents 24 hours then 2555 is 1 second.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:09 AM Lindy Mayfield wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that address spaces can be made exempt from 522 timeouts if
> t
Well, if that represents 24 hours then 2555 is 1 second.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:09 AM Lindy Mayfield wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that address spaces can be made exempt from 522 timeouts if
> there is a particular value in one of three control blocks. If I have it
> correct they are:
>
>
Hi,
I understand that address spaces can be made exempt from 522 timeouts if there
is a particular value in one of three control blocks. If I have it correct
they are:
1) The JSTL is 86400 seconds (Comes from TIME=1440 on Job card?)
2) The ASCBTOFF bit in the ASCBRCTF is set
