Re: Authorized and unauthorized in same address space

2019-03-28 Thread Brian Chapman
ur J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Brian Chapman > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:06 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Authorized and unauthorized in same a

Re: Authorized and unauthorized in same address space

2019-03-28 Thread Seymour J Metz
Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Brian Chapman Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Authorized and unauthorized in same address space Searching through the archiv

Re: Authorized and unauthorized in same address space

2019-03-28 Thread Brian Chapman
*2. Run authorized tasks in parallel with unauthorized tasks - bigger issue.You cannot use any user key storage - even the passed save area or the LEanchor. No LM 14,12,12(13) at the end of your module - use SVC 3. AllSTORAGE/GETMAIN to protected subpools. And if you will be fetching fetchprotected

Re: Authorized and unauthorized in same address space

2019-03-28 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Two separate things: 1. Prepare user supplied authorized services and then change the job to unauthorized - perfectly fine,as long as you follow standard authorized service logic, i.e., never trust any user supplied address and use protected storage as your worrkarea. 2. Run authorized tasks in p

Authorized and unauthorized in same address space

2019-03-28 Thread Brian Chapman
Searching through the archives, I quickly saw that this has been a repeat heated discussion, but all of the discussions seem to ignore the fact that CICS initializes as an authorized address space, performs authorized work, and then disables authorization to load unathorized programs from the DFHRP