Re: Actual signs set by the DP (divide decimal) instruction

2021-01-20 Thread Jantje.
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:40:34 -0600, John Ganci wrote: >In order to see how z390 handles the signs, a short program that does some >divisions for (dividend,divisor) pairs having signs A,B,C,D (16 combinations) >was run on z390. Partial results: Why not post your test program code iso. of the re

Re: Actual signs set by the DP (divide decimal) instruction

2021-01-19 Thread John Ganci
Thanks for your reply. That clears it up for me. My bad for not rereading the section on decimal codes at the beginning of Chapter 8 before posting my question! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: Actual signs set by the DP (divide decimal) instruction

2021-01-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:40:34 -0600, John Ganci wrote: >... >"The sign of the quotient is determined by the rules of algebra. The sign of >the remainder has the same value as the dividend sign. These rules hold even >when the quotient or remainder is zero." > Does this guarantee the convention

Re: Actual signs set by the DP (divide decimal) instruction

2021-01-19 Thread Seymour J Metz
du/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of John Ganci [0313d5d8c097-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 12:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Actual signs set by the DP (divide decimal) instruction I am working on

Actual signs set by the DP (divide decimal) instruction

2021-01-19 Thread John Ganci
I am working on z390 (Don Higgins' software) fixes to the emulation of the DP (divide decimal) instruction and have a question as to what signs are set for the remainder. Normally I would answer my own question by running sample programs, but I am retired and do not have access to a mainframe.