Yeah, this is one of the things that has me muttering darkly upon
occasion.
The mount parm is "AGGRGROW".
The command is "zfsadm grow". No aggr.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: "Staller, Allan"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:
Listcat the zFS. It is the secondary allocation by default, I do believe.
You can override this by hand with the zfsadm grow command but if it is
done as a result of the AGGRGROW parm on the mount it is the secondary
allocation of the linear VSAM cluster, IIRC.
Thomas Ambros
Operating System
You wrote:
"In such case one should write new IOCDS from current IODF file."
Always, then switch it to active in the HCD dialog after activating the
IODF. That write protects it. I'm fairly certain that releases write
protect on the last one.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivit
In my opinion you may run into some interesting issues with timestamped
stuff in the CFs and whatnot if the times start coming in a slightly
unpredictable sequence. I don't think I'd take that risk.
When we migrated from ETR to mixed to all STP CTN, the key was two
machines were ETR and had t
You don't have another working console in the sysplex? If you don't vary
the offending system out of the sysplex when it behaves as you describe
it'll be a while (failure interval) before serialized resources are freed
up and any new serialization takes place, if I remember correctly. If you
Perhaps because it is a new version all that stuff starts over. Just a
guess.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: "Storr, Lon A CTR USARMY HRC (US)"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 11/20/2013 09:10
Subject:New and improved V2R
Is there any reason to change the console ID other than to your boss's ID
right before you do something mischievous?
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Paul Gilmartin
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 10/04/2013 11:34
Subject:Re
A group is concerned that we have a single RACF database and there is no
'test' RACF database where the organization can implement 'test' rulesets.
We have two sysplexes - a systems sandbox with no applications and a
mixed development/production sysplex where all the applications reside.
The o
but at this point that's all it is, a guess.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Central Storage reallocation on z9 - requirement to
tfm in order to sleep well tonight): the
answer is NO?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 16:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Central Storage reallocation on z9 - re
PR/SM Planning Guide spells it out.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Tom Ambros
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/11/2013 09:20
Subject:Central Storage reallocation on z9 - requirement to be
contiguous?
Sent by:IBM
z9 with three partitions, activated in order A, B, C. No reserved storage
defined. We need to remove some storage from C and assign it to A.
Without any operations on B, can we deactivate C, reduce initial storage,
reactivate it and then deactivate A later that night, increase initial
storage
We're migrating from mixed-mode to STP-only mode in the near future. The
standalone coupling facilities are such that we will need to drop the CF
links to the last ETR-only machine after it is shut down and replace them
with STP-only links between the coupling facilities, no room to do
otherwi
I vaguely remember some advice somewhere that it is cleaner to remove the
CF definitions as you go. 'Setting Up A Sysplex' has procedures to do
this. Same reason we don't maintain the DR CF definitions in our policies
because structure allocation may get twisty.
I'd go something like this:
Does the product give you the option of specifying the SVC number, a la
Hogan?
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: David Andrews
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 03/05/2013 08:21
Subject:Re: Assigning Same SVC Number
Sent by:
ROUTED or LOCAL? I *think* it may have to be ROUTED but I am not finding
any information to conclusively prove that and before I test it out, I
ask. The reason I ask is because I have reason to specify a traffic
descriptor for a restricted set of ports and that would not be in
compliance with
Family are producers in Vermont so seeing the cache described in the NYT
as the 'global strategic reserve' gave me a chuckle.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Mike Schwab
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 12/27/2012 01:28
Subject:
n on, a virtual
terminal owned by TN3270 signed on.
You would have to capture it from TCP/IP somehow and hand it off to your
RACF exit.
Not an entire answer, but I hope this helps.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
I apologize if this has been covered already, but I probably need to tell
somebody if this can be done before I read up and put the pieces together.
If I have an SSL-capable emulator, is it possible to validate the client
certificate and extract the userid (this part, at least, I know can be
You want to use zOSMF and the configuration selections within there. It
is possible to write the configuration files yourself but it is much like
taping together the contents of a shredder bucket to restore the original
documents. It is not a requirement to use the GUI but you will be glad
yo
We are in the process of implementing the Payment Card Industry Data
Security Standards and in an effort to cover everything and not be obliged
to look at each instance in a one-off we are curious how other sysplex
implementations were done. We would like to understand if we can approach
this
It cracks me up that there are about 12 posts about the name and nothing
about the content.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Phil Smith III
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/28/2012 08:47
Subject:Re: The IBM zEnterprise EC1
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:12:54 -0700, John Mattson wrote:
>And the grand prize goes to Tom Ambros
>Yes, use DOUBLE AMPERSANDS in REXX and the FINDs work properly.
>So simple when we finally see it. Many thanks to everyone.
>
So is
That's strange, they work fine as Rexx for me:
JCL: Note line 4
//REMOTE DD DISP=SHR,DSN=MSYS.UCMD.REMOTE&PDQR.(&SYSTEM)
//REMOTE DD DISP=SHR,DSN=MSYS.UCMD.REMOTE&PDQR.(SYSTEM)
//REMOTE DD DISP=SHR,DSN=MSYS.UCMD.REMOTE&PDQR(SYSTEM)
//* TEST LINE TO BE X ALL'ED AND NOT FOUND IN FIND A
This is probably easier.
ISREDIT "SCAN OFF"
ISREDIT "F ALL 'DISP=SHR,DSN=MSYS.UCMD.REMOTE&&PDQR' "
ISREDIT "SCAN ON"
Scan is initialized to ON when the macro starts so unconditionally
changing it is probably OK.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
5
Check out SCAN mode discussion in ISPF Edit and Edit Macros doc. It has
good instructions and example.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Tom Ambros
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/18/2012 13:41
Subject:Re: SV: REXX ISPF
Is it possible that if you code &PDQR as &&PDQR edit strips the first
ampersand and looks for the string the way you want? I have some code
which does something similar with &SYSNAME variable in the started task
JCL. I change a string containing that variable during DR adjustments of
the VTA
Phil Smith wrote:
"Yes, Protected Key requires ICSF and a CEX."
Should that not read "Yes, Secure Key requires ICSF and a CEX."?
Blatant plagiarism follows from my copy of the z196 Tech Guide, Section
6.2.2 'CPACF Protected key':
"The zEnterprise CPCs support the protected key implementati
EICO
> System z Team Leader
> mailto:sknut...@geico.com
> (office) 301.986.3574
> (cell) 301.996.1318
>
> "Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..."
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IB
orth of
> idle speculation :-)
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Sam Knutson, GEICO
> System z Team Leader
> mailto:sknut...@geico.com
> (office) 301.986.3574
> (cell) 301.996.1318
&g
"Complicated legacy mainframe system"? It's CA-7! If they think that's
complicated they probably can't work a Mr. Coffee.
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: Ed Gould
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 06/27/2012 00:44
Subject:'
31 matches
Mail list logo
