Would cut all the *llsh*t out and save time and money, wait a minute - that
makes too much sense. If something tells you what you want to hear all the time
what happens to the stuff you really need to hear to keep a close eye on, yes,
all the a**hol** out there who want to make/take, it all.
T
$JDHISTORY(JOES),HOURS=73 command fails after default of 72 hours. I'm seeing
this on both 1.13 and 2.2 systems.
Without the hours parameter the default of 72 entries is returned.
I'd like to get additional history on JOES. Anyone seeing similar or know of a
fix or circumvention?
TIA...
Trying to hunt down why MULC report is throwing the below, have not had issues
with this, until now. It seems this happened when we moved from z/OS 2.1 to 2.2
but I can’t confirm, yet.
IFA351E VENDOR EXIT unknown IS REQUIRED BUT WAS NOT LOADED
IFA340E VENDOR EXIT unknown IS DISABLED DUE
lex-wide services on behalf of the SDSFAUX
started task.
Rob Scott
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Patrick Falcone
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 7:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: XCF Group HSFIXC ?
No id
No idea what this is, any pointers appreciated. TIA...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks Tomothy,
Your below is on target, appreciate your input and will take into consideration
information provided.
From: Timothy Sipples
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: DB2 Ver. 8.1 running on z/OS 2.1?
Lucas,
I think Patrick al
:00 Patrick Falcone <
012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> Anyone running DB2 version 8.1 on z/OS 2.1? I'm looking to verify, any
> links or information would be appreciated. Thank You.
>
--
For IBM-M
Anyone running DB2 version 8.1 on z/OS 2.1? I'm looking to verify, any links or
information would be appreciated. Thank You.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@lists
I seem to remember a similar type problem from very early days of WLM Managed
Initiators. Thanks for the heads up Mark.
Kees, curious if this is a full on WLM Managed environment or a mix of JES and
WLM managed.
From: Mark Zelden
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017
Somehow we got dinged on this, maybe it was MULC. We had recently done a CMF
conversion and it kept showing up in one of the usage reports but the task(s)
were not active. I'm fairly certain that we had RMF enabled in IFA and had CMF
also running but no RMF tasks active.
From: Al Sherkow
Someone slip some automation in to display the world or any other potential
variant?
From: Phil Smith
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 10:03 PM
Subject: Dumb WLM question
There are about a thousand questions here that we should h
Argh...I can't find this. I'm sure it's out there, somewhere. If someone has a
link I'd be grateful.
Is there a hardware compliance restriction with bringing a z890 into a plex
w/z10 CF @ CF16 with z9 and up members?
TIA...
ly full for 20%.
So, were the page datasets moved with pagedel/pageadd? Then the utilization
figures should be seen in a completely different light. However, not the page
rates of course.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Hmm...I've been following this as well. So I'm wondering what affect
dynamically cutting over the disk subsystem by delete/draining from old aux.
while adding new aux. might have on STGTEST, prior to the IPL to
cleanup/cutover. I saw some strangeness during this type cutover on a DB2 LPAR
where
Kees,
I suspect the loopers don't give WLM enough time to react to the WLM Resource
Group cap.
If I understand your below the 2 MSU's is just under 1% of the total. With a
more normal workload, less consistent arrival rate, you may get more desirable
results. I guess unless you're running lo
15 matches
Mail list logo
