Yes it will online.
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, 10:15:04 PM GMT+3:30, Rob Schramm
wrote:
What happens if you box a device offline?
Can you bring it back online?
Rob Schramm
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 2:19 AM Mehrshad Manshadi <
0056e0e17177-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wr
but the problem still there.
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019, 1:46:27 PM GMT+3:30, Mehrshad Manshadi
wrote:
Yes it will online.
On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, 10:15:04 PM GMT+3:30, Rob Schramm
wrote:
What happens if you box a device offline?
Can you bring it back online
There was a sample WLM(z/os work load management ) setting in the internet
which i downloaded long time ago.
Anybody have that internet address?
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send em
In response to a D U,,ALLOC command, msgIEE106I is issued
indicating a jobname of *UNKNOWN for certain DASD units. It is
also not possible to Vary the unit(s) offline (unable to vary).
This problem was traced to an OEM product changing the UCB
in a job's TIOT without incrementing the new UCB's
48 AM Mehrshad Manshadi <
0056e0e17177-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
> The IRIOWTT(Interregion I/O wait time) time is very high(14 min).
> Would you please help me to know the cause and which parameter i should
> contro
Hi,
The IRIOWTT(Interregion I/O wait time) time is very high(14 min).
Would you please help me to know the cause and which parameter i should control
to prevent this issue?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
Hi,
I am trying to apply UI15763 PTF on DB2 10 ( z/OS 1.12 ).
The following error is appeared :
GIM23901E ** LINK-EDIT PROCESSING FOR SYSMOD UI12617 FAILED FOR MODULE DSNHAPLY
IN LMOD DSNHPC IN THE SDSNLOAD LIBRARY. THE RETURN CODE (04)
EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE VALUE. DATE 16.054 - TIME 14:53:18 -
S
Dear Steve
As I understand from your explanations, compiling COBOL in 64 bit mode is not
useful.
But the question is that this much of addressable of memory (64 Bit ) is for
what ?Because as I know most the applications in mainframe are developed by
COBOL and C.(Mostly COBOL)Best regardsMansha
Hi,I am looking for COBOL compiler option to compile our COBOL programs in 64
Bit mode.Please lead me if you have such a experience .The COBOL version is 4.2
on Z9 with z/OS 1.12.Best regardsManshadi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Hi,After completion concurrent copy in the XRC session while all the volumes
are in DUP status we encountered the following messages and the ANTAS001 will
dropped.
ANTQ5006E XQUERY FAILED FOR SESSION(DS1), RC=4026 REAS=0
IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X80A MATCHED. JOBNAME=ANTAS001, ASID=004
.
Thanks
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:34 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
Set MASDEF to 100. Or change your I/O gen so only 1 system uses JES2
Checkpoint Volumes with MASDEF=.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Mehrshad Manshadi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered the following messa
Hi,
I encountered the following message on the production system as follows :
IEF196I IOS071I 1000,4D,*MASTER*, MISSING CHANNEL AND DEVICE END
IOS071I 1000,4D,*MASTER*, MISSING CHANNEL AND DEVICE END 873
IEF196I IOS079I 1000,11,XCFAS, I/O TIMEOUT INTERVAL HAS BEEN EXCEEDED
Hello all,
does anyone have a "rule of thumb" as to how much Replication for disaster
recovery slows down overall disk I/O?
We are replicating about 45 terabytes from HDS USP using asynch. We recently
had issues that slowed our mainframe to a crawl. The work around was to stop
replication. Du
Thank you very much for your usefull information.
We have HDS with 32 Gig cash .with 590 volume 3390 model 9 .
The connection between disk and cpu in the local site is 3 ficon channel.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archi
Hi,
Thanks.
Whenever we are using XRC the mirror is Asynchronous. am I right?
Is there possible establish synchronous pair with XRC? any parameter?
Regards
Manshadi
From: Mehrshad Manshadi
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:52
, Mehrshad Manshadi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have an XRC session with 590 volume 3390 model 9, which is established on
> disaster recovery site on 450 k far from our local site. The connection is
> STM1 150 mbs between local and disaster recovery site.
>
> we are using Cisco MDS 9222
Hi,
We have an XRC session with 590 volume 3390 model 9, which is established on
disaster recovery site on 450 k far from our local site. The connection is STM1
150 mbs between local and disaster recovery site.
we are using Cisco MDS 9222i as a switch between ESS on local site and SDM on
disas
heweb at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
10/08/2012 10:10:10 AM:
> From: Mehrshad Manshadi
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
> Date: 10/08/2012 10:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option
Problem.
> S
://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
10/08/2012 08:03:35 AM:
> From: Mehrshad Manshadi
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
> Date: 10/08/2012 08:06 AM
> Subject: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option
Problem.
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe
Hi,
We have a table space with 250 partition and 4,600,000,000 records which it's
have to re partition.
Because of lack space on the DASD we are trying to use Tape on some DD cards as
follows :
//SYSREC DD DSN=TEMPDS.TAPE1,DISP=(MOD,CATLG),
// UNIT=CART,RETPD=36,BLKSIZ
don't have any HW message nor any system
messages on whatever console
While your system is "hung" what's its status on HMC console???
Has your system some parallel channel ??
Hi.
Paolo Cacciari
IBM BCRS Senior IT Specialist - Certified
From: Mehrshad Manshadi
messages. We have two other LPARs; one is production; the
other is "development". The "development" LPAR is not weighted as high as the
production one. It also "pauses" for a short time at this point, whereas the
production one does not.
_
alf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 1:48 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IPL Probelm.
>
> Not so much a hardware, but more an IOCDS or configuration problem.
> If you don't know what a waitstate is, ask you operators, they should
There is an wait state on the system I will investigate that.
From: Mehrshad Manshadi
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: IPL Probelm.
Ok thanks for your explanation.
From
belm.
=>
=> As Gadi said, the problem occurs after these messages.
=> Did you check for a waitstate?
=>
=> Kees.
=>
=> "Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
=> news:<1346908204.56278.yahoomail...@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>...
=>> Hi,
=>>
=&g
.!!!???
From: "Vernooij, CP - SPLXM"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: IPL Probelm.
Did you check if the machine entered a Waitstate?
Kees.
"Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
news:<1346919709.93592.yahoomai
after these messages.
Did you check for a waitstate?
Kees.
"Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
news:<1346908204.56278.yahoomail...@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>...
> Hi,
>
> During IPL the system the last message which appear on the console is as
> follows and after
ystem will hanged.
Best regards
Manshadi
____
From: Mehrshad Manshadi
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: IPL Probelm.
We disconnected all 2074 consoles from the machine and IPLed it from HMC but
the same proble
any post-NIP messages
V CN(*),ACTIVATE
Ant.
Northern Territory Government
"Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
news:<1346908204.56278.yahoomail...@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>...
> Hi,
>
> During IPL the system the last message which appear on the console is as
>
Hi,
During IPL the system the last message which appear on the console is as
follows and after that the machine is not available any more.
I tried to IPL from HMC but the problem is exactly same.
CUN2046I AN EMPTY UNICODE ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
CUN2005I CONVERSION ENVIRONMENT SUCCESSF
is interesting:
Excp, Conn are the same!! Apparently there is no difference in the actual I/O.
TCB and SIO are higher. What is SIO, where does this come from? What is the
relationship between Excp and SIO? Do you use hardware compression, can this be
switched off after 12 hours?
Kees.
"Mehrs
compression, can this be
switched off after 12 hours?
Kees.
"Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
news:<1345115098.18256.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>...
> We have this degradation for all the jobs after 12 hours of POR and IPL.
> We are using Goal Mode.
&g
.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.
Mehrshad Manshadi wrote:
> No this happen for all the jobs.Like ( Reorg , load )
Re-org is sometimes heavy on resources, but managable. YMMV.
> We are using the simple dump just for test.
Please
: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.
Mehrshad Manshadi wrote:
>We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064
>-1C5) with Z/OS 1.8 as operating system and the other is CPU Z900(2064-216)
>with the same operating system.
z/OS 1.8 is unsupported.
>When we power on r
Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.
I think you should then look into the Dasd response times and its components.
Check what changes, when, and maybe what happens at that moment on the other
LPAR, that could cause it.
Kees.
"Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
news:<1345111839.52175.yahoomai
make sure: is only the dump job or jobs delayed or all jobs?
Kees.
"Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
news:<1345111464.97036.yahoomail...@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>...
> Yes we checked EREP but it doesn't show anything.
>
> We run the same job from othe
What happens to that LPAR's response
times?
Kees.
"Mehrshad Manshadi" wrote in message
news:<1345106626.32723.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>...
> Hi all,
> We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064
> -1C5) with Z/OS 1.8
Hi all,
We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064 -1C5)
with Z/OS 1.8 as operating system and the other is CPU Z900(2064-216) with the
same operating system.
We have a weird problem with CPU 2064-216 as follows:
When we power on reset the CPU and IPL from that,It
38 matches
Mail list logo
