Hi Len,
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:03:03 +
"Sasso, Len" wrote:
> Hello Manfred !
>
> We are at z/OS 2.3 and have not been able to locate these files:
>
> "In z/OS UNIX they can be found in the /bin directory.
>
> /bin/md5
> /bin/rmd160
> /bin/sha1
> /bin/sha224
> /bin/sha256
> /bin/sha384
> /
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:10:38 -0500
Bill Godfrey wrote:
> These z/OS UNIX commands require ICSF to be active.
> Otherwise you get this:
> $ echo testing | md5
> FSUMF437 ICSF is required but not available.
> $ echo testing | sha256
> FSUMF437 ICSF is required but not available.
>
Yes, exactly. T
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:07:01 +0200
Manfred Lotz wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:53:39 +
> "Sasso, Len" wrote:
>
> > Anyone know if a Checksum/Md5 file can be created on a IBM
> > Mainframe?
> >
> > If so, how?
> >
> >
>
>
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:53:39 +
"Sasso, Len" wrote:
> Anyone know if a Checksum/Md5 file can be created on a IBM Mainframe?
>
> If so, how?
>
>
I may be a bit late to the party but if you happen to have z/OS 2.4 or
z/OS 2.3 then there is
APPLICABLE COMPONENT LEVEL/SU:
R7C0 PSY UJ03195 UP2
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 13:33:10 +
"Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek)" wrote:
> With z/OS 2.2 the command: ls -la /etc returns:
>
> total 1644
> drwxr-xr-x 16 MVSTCP OMVSGRP 8192 Aug 10 2016 .
> drwxr-xr-x 17 MVSTCP OMVSGRP 8192 Oct 19 2017 ..
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 MVSTCP OMVSGRP24486
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 23:21:53 -0600
Bruce Hewson wrote:
> As I see it you have 2 problems:
>
> 1. identify the running HSM task name.
> 2. identify the active BCDS dataset name.
>
> How about using some ENQUEUE queries?
>
> firstly find the HSM task name:.
>
> some suitable MAJOR names to ch
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:11:35 -0600
DanD wrote:
> Actually, if you check SHOWZOS it bounces through control blocks to
> locate the BCDS, MCDS, OCDS an JRNL.
>
Well, yes and no. Currently, SHOWZOS is only able to find the first
BCDS and MCDS. In case of a multi CDS environment it won't show the
o
t: Monday, January 22, 2018 4:19 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Finding the names of hsm's BCDSs
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, at 10:03, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:24:54 -0800
> > > Ron hawkins wrote:
> &
or
> something.
>
> Ant.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Graham Harris Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2018 6:39 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Finding the names of hsm
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:04:11 +0200
ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Can you tell about the languages you wish to use and if this code
> runs on a server side or client (TSO, Batch).
>
Assembler. The program runs in TSO.
--
Manfred
> ITschak
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:0
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:01:22 +
Rob Scott wrote:
> In the meantime, you could try and come up with a safer local
> solution based around using ISGQUERY for the SYSDSN major name
> enqueues for the HSM address space.
>
> Depending on local naming standards you could probably spot the BCDS
> da
pport AR mode.
Is there a way to get access to another address space's TIOT? Any
ideas much appreciated.
--
Thanks a lot,
Manfred Lotz
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send emai
Hi there,
I have a JES2 exit 6 which till today used JCTJCLAS. Now in z/OS 2.1 with up to
8 bytes job class groups/names there is JCXJCLA8 in $JCTX.
Question: Do I now simply ignore JCTJCLAS and use JCXJCLA8 instead or is it
more complicated like using JCTJCLAS if it is a 1-byte job class, and
lot, Manfred
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
> On 9/27/2013 1:21 AM, Manfred Lotz wrote:
>
>> The change is this:
>>
>
> [snip]
>
> There is nothing to worry about. The two expansions make the identical
> service call (as seen by the operating s
Yep, I compared the assembler listings. The result was that there was no
difference in code so that SPLEVEL SET=6 had no effect for this particular
program. I wanted to get rid of this ancient setting. So I happily did set
the SPLEVEL to 6.
--
Thanks, Manfred
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Pe
SR1,1 ZERO RESERVED REG 1
01-GETM
+ SVC 120 ISSUE GETMAIN SVC
01-GETM
--
Manfred
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Manfred Lotz
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Ed Jaffe >wrote:
> >
> >> On
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
> On 9/26/2013 2:51 AM, Manfred Lotz wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I've got a very old assembler program which still has a
>>SPLEVEL SET=2
>> statement at the beginning.
>>
>> I think that th
Hm, I only have a USS version of zip and unzip to be run in a shell, or if in
batch then for instance in BPXBATCH.
Here a command line example:
unzip test.zip
unpacks all files in test.zip into the current directory
unzip -d out test.zip
unpacks all files in test.zip into directory out w
< The truncation occurred in the sftp transmission step(s). I was able to get
the zip part of Infozip to work, but not the unzip. Would you be willing
< to share you Infozip zip/unzip programs?
I would be willing. But what I have is just the software from the download page.
Let us first inves
< I know the Info-zip program is very old, year 2000, but I need a FREE
compression program that checks the consistency of the
compressed file when it is uncompressed.
info-zip works fine on one of our systems (z/OS 1.13 USS).
There is another possibility to zip a file. You could use jar, the
Hi all,
I've got a very old assembler program which still has a
SPLEVEL SET=2
statement at the beginning.
I think that these days this is obsolete and should be removed.
As I'm not sure if removing this could break anything what could I check
(besides testing the program itself) in order
Thanks for your (and the others) reply.
What I read from the replies confirms my view that LOC=(xx,64) is generally
good if I have no special stuff regarding real pages in my code.
--
Thanks,
Manfred
--
For IBM-MAIN subscr
Hi there,
I'm maintaining a larger program written in assembler where GETMAINs have
mostly LOC=(BELOW,ANY) or LOC=(ANY,ANY).
This program doesn't use anything like PGSER, EXCPVR or the like.
My question: In order to give the operating system most flexibility wouldn't it
be recommended to cha
23 matches
Mail list logo
