On Sun, 11 May 2025 06:37:56 +, Farley, Peter
wrote:
>Thanks Linda for the response and the idea for a work-around.
>
>On a slightly different subject, is it true (as I read elsewhere) that the new
>clang-based C/C++ compiler has no listing options at all? How in the world
>are programmer
On Fri, 9 May 2025 19:18:26 +, Farley, Peter
wrote:
>The C/C++ "standard" includes (stdio, etc.) have a lot of intermediate
>"baggage" that is usually (though not always) not relevant to a programmer's
>investigations and reviews.
>
>Is it possible (maybe via #pragma?) to positionally "tur
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 18:19:53 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 09:45:02 -0500, Linda Chui wrote:
>
>
>
>>Assuming your -mzos-sys-include comes from
>>https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/open-xl-c-cpp-zos/2.1?topic=compiler-jcl-example,
>>you can see the pr
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:19:18 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:38:38 -0500, Linda Chui wrote:
>
>>The errors you saw were likely from using the wrong header set.
>
>Linda, thanks for taking the time to help.
>
>I believe I am doing things exac
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:44:17 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
>Is it just me or does the "new" IBM Open XL C/C++ compiler seem
>under-documented?
>
>(This is in the department of old dogs trying to learn new tricks.)
>
>I am very, very familiar with the "legacy" IBM z/OS XL C/C++ compiler. (Is it
>j
wer. It is a bit that
>> represented the loss of 2GB address room.
>>
>> Thank you for the doc link. I am happy to learn there is nothing really
>> important that I missed.
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> René Jansen.
>>
>>> On 1 Nov 2024, at 21:45,
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 13:47:36 +0100, René Jansen wrote:
>Reading through the release notes (the "what's new") of the LLVM-Clang based
>C/C++ compiler for z/OS I see support for 32-bit programs and XPLINK32
>linkage. Now I have to admit that I not followed all news closely but I even
>have a hard
On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:32:54 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
>What does the LLVM project "Clang" compiler -- which is the "new" or "current"
>IBM C/C++ compiler for z/OS -- use for libraries? Is it open source?
>
>Charles
>
>On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:08:15 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>>I wasn't sure w
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 19:00:02 -0500, Eric Erickson wrote:
>Using XL C on z/OS V2R5. I've got a set of #ifdefs in a header file that are
>not giving me the results I expect. I know on other compilers I've used in the
>past that there were options to output all input statements showing the
>#ifde
On Mon, 8 May 2023 17:58:19 +, Farley, Peter
wrote:
>I am more than a bit confused. I know I saw an announcement that XLC 2.4.1
>was available for download, but exactly which version is supplied in the z/OS
>PDSE's in an existing z/OS 2.4 environment? Is this new XLC version available
>
On Mon, 1 May 2023 18:18:38 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
>Doh, I of course meant -qasm not -dasm.
>
>
>
>From: Phil Smith III
>Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 5:02 PM
>To: ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu; IBM Mainframe Assembler List
>(assembler-l...@listserv.uga.edu)
>Subject: XLC inline assembler question
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:41:38 +0100, Colin Paice wrote:
>mhvr...@us.ibm.com is the right address for z/OS products.They are not
>very good at replying or acknowledging.
>Colin
>
>On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 at 16:31, Farley, Peter <
>031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> Is there
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:24:25 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
>SC14-7307-40, the z/OS 2.4 XL C/C++ User's Guide, says on PDF page 63 that
>ARCH(10) is the default. However, on PDF page 580, it also says:
>Architecture target is set according to the last-found instance of the
>-qarch compiler option,
Hi,
(Posting on behalf of a colleague)
The initial question about include files, that depends on what was used for the
#include in the source. If it was something like #include “abc.h” then it
should take the current directory first (see the LSEARCH option defaults). Only
if they used the #inc
Another approach is to resubmit via ShopZ but include a comment about not
wanting S&S. There's a detailed set of instructions written on how to do that
for Node.js, but you can follow the same for Python:
https://community.ibm.com/community/user/ibmz-and-linuxone/blogs/blog-entry1/2019/07/15/o
riginal Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>> Behalf Of Linda Chui
>> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 12:11 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Meta languages [was: RE: Assembler Language Programming
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:27:06 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>On 6/04/2021 9:53 pm, Charles Mills wrote:
>>> You don't use templates
>> I certainly do use templates. Not sure how you get "don't use templates"
>> from what I wrote. Heck, I *over* used templates in the first large C++
>> project I ev
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:29:05 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>Classification: Confidential
>
>z/OS 2.3 is EOS Sep. 2021. JAVA8 is not( I just ordered it for my z/OS 2.4
>upgrade). I don't follow JAVA closely enough to wonder about what happened to
>JAVA9/JAVA10 on z/OS.
>The last time I looked, IBM
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 21:37:56 -0500, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
>Hi
>
>
>
>I am getting the following error on a CATTR Assembly statement
>
>
>
>0001B0A 1B51 2833 OPENFI#C CSECT ,
>00
>
>�2834 M_WSACATTR
>RMODE(ANY),P
hi Sam,
Those symbols are not intended to be externalized, they are marked with
visibility being hidden. Please check the setting of
_LIBCPP_THREAD_ABI_VISIBILITY.
If that doesn't help, could you please open a case with IBM support so we can
help you better.
https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/
hi Scott,
Thank you for opening a case for this in our official support channel. We will
handle from there.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the messa
; in the
top right.
https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/topic/0TO0z006v5OGAQ/cobol?language=en_US&productId=01t0z07g71VAAQ
Thank you!
Linda Chui
Enterprise Products & Compilers
IBM Canada Lab
On Wed, 20 May 2020 15:07:39 -0700, ste...@copper.net wrote:
>We setup for OPT(1) b
22 matches
Mail list logo
