Is there any reason why idle users should not be forced off the system.?
Sounds like very sloppy system management.to allow this.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Phil Smith III
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025, 15:02
Subject: Re: Disable user timeout via JWT?
To:
Hmm. Still got an S522 ove
Yes. A volume can be rejected if there is insufficient space in the vtoc.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024, 3:59 PM rpinion865 <
042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> In addition to free space on the volume, does SMS look at the utilization
> of the VTOC and
> VTOC index when choosing a vo
Are you talking about choosing your own HLQ for page datasets?
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024, 2:54 PM Mark Jacobs <
0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I seem to recall, but can't find anything that confirms my recollection
> that certain HLQs such as SYS1 and PAGE have special power
he,
> > mainly for system tools ISVs. Metal C is where the invisible hand of IBM
> is
> > pushing the industry.
>
> And Ray is one of the most respected in the field.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 5, 2023, 10:22 AM, David Ell
Very little from what I see. What little
there is is stupid stuff like reverse engineering code so that the client
can rewrite it in JAVA or whatever the language of the day is.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, 6:48 AM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> How much demand i
Not seeing much in the way of responses to your question, Lance. Could be
you are asking an impossible question. like ' Is there a god?' or 'is
global warming real?' Were you expecting an outpouring of enthusiasm for
this nebulous technology? What were your experiences? Did you get what you
were p
HOW DARE YOU question the wisdom of the great and all powerful zOSMF. ?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022, 3:29 PM Michael Babcock wrote:
> We are installing z/OS 2.5 via z/OSMF and are using the Modify Deployment
> screens. We can easily change the volumes, HLQs, etc, but wanted to modify
> the Primary and
Out of idle curiosity, what would you do with such a list?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022, 11:09 AM Jim Elliott wrote:
> I am trying to build a list of companies in the USA or Canada that do
> contract systems programming / operations support for z/OS, z/VSE, and/or
> z/VM. I am not looking for outsourcers
Carefully avoiding the identity of the employer I notice.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022, 8:26 AM Steve Watson <
03fa58f526aa-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> HI- My employer is looking for a US based Systems Programmer with
> experience in at least one of these areas: z/OS, COMS, Storage. Skill
Use your JCL. Run a step to check the existence of a, if a not found use
conditional exec to delete b,c and d.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021, 2:51 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 21:10:32 +, PINION, RICHARD W. wrote:
>
> >I'm going to a
I think NO is the short answer to your question. This sort of problem can
be very frustrating to deal with.
A VVDS is supposed to be an ESDS but it's not . It cannot easily be
modified or have records deleted. Weird stuff happens if you try.
On at least one occasion I have taken a big hammer to the
Does anyone out there know what is meant by the expression "Mainframe
Modernization' '? It seems to be catching on with the Bobs but when you
ask exactly how they propose to modernize their systems all you get is
silence. As in if you don"know we shouldn't even be talking about it.
Any ideas ? Or
Why ? Is it bothering you? That is the catalog.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 7:57 AM Mark Jacobs <
0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I have this entry in a catalog, I'd like to delete it. What's the
> recommended way to do so?
>
> CLUSTER --- 00
Google it. There is a preview published and one or two other documents.
I hope you are not hoping for any surprises.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021, 7:40 AM Richards, Robert B. (CTR) <
01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I haven't been able to find anything on z/OS 2.5. It is supposed
You could use the dsr smf records which will give you the types of open.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, 10:27 AM Matthew Stitt
wrote:
> CBT file 527. DADSM or LISTICAT.
>
> I have a slightly newer DADSM, mostly larger print fields.
>
> Matthew
>
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:26:53 -0500, Jasi Grewal wrote:
You should spend an hour or five with your CICS Performance book then all
will become clear.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:41 PM Bob Bridges wrote:
> I've worked at a number of mainframe installations, and at many of them
> I've encountered a dataset that logs usage of CICS transactions. Usually
> i
yes
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 10:40 AM Steve Beaver wrote:
> Does any one in the group use command verifier?
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
May mean the volume containing the original catalog has gone away. so
export disconnect the thing.and find something else to worry about.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@li
Yes. I get these things by the ton too.
Greetinshowareyoutodayhopyoudoingreat
don't waste your time with these things there's nothing behind most of them.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, 9:50 AM Bob Bridges wrote:
> Not too long ago on the RACF-L listserv someone mentioned a dearth of
> mainframe jobs, an
What exactly is the question here? Where did the idea of SSI calls 16 and
17 in the subject come from? Are you saying that there are function codes
16 and 17 being issued but you just have no documentation on them? Have you
intercepted 16 and 17 calls? IBM seems to be quite definite in their
state
Used SHOWMVS for many years, usually in batch, not authorized. One of the
things I liked about it was the ability to quickly check the integrity of a
customer's APF, LINK and LPA lists for missing and incorrectly cataloged
libraries.
Now, with V721, all I see in the output in these sections are qu
This happened to me a while back. Intermittently I would see this from a
LISTCAT ENTRY(xx) command. The 448 is, I believe,the last three chars of
16448 which is X'4040'. It was looking to me as though there was some
corruption of R15 at the end of the command. The command executed normally
in my ca
22 matches
Mail list logo
