Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Jousma, David
AFAIK, there is no shutting off SYSTEM SSL. Years ago, and a few generations of Crypto adapters ago, we IPL’d before Crypto adapters were fully initialized (there is a time factor when installing MCL’s), and System SSL was “broken” from a TCPIP perspective. The fix was to recycle TCPIP, we el

Re: HMC hang up (z16)

2025-04-14 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
Reboot? How??? Method 1: Logon to HMC and select Reboot. However no user can log on. Method 2: unplug power from both power supplies. This is the thing I described already and I don't want to perform. Note: SE (Primary or Alternate) is a guest virtual machine of HMC. Method 3: please advice. L

Re: HMC hang up (z16)

2025-04-14 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential Reboot the hmc. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 2:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: HMC hang up (z16) [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Eric Rossman
I misread the thread of conversation. Yeah, what we call a "long burn" (very long MCL apply) can take as much as 15 minutes, so it is very well worth waiting until MCL is fully applied and the cards are back to operational before attempting to IPL. That said, most of the crypto MCLs are concurr

HMC hang up (z16)

2025-04-14 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
I have observed the following problem: HMC is hanging up. I connect to HMC using web browser. So far so good. Then I click "logon", type user and password and... nothing happens. For hours. The same problem occurs when I try to logon using local console. The console is working, I can logon to SE

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Phil Smith III
If I had access to that log, I'd look at it. Long gone, I'm afraid...not my system. And I don't think they'd just IPLed when it went bad, though it's possible. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 3:20 PM To: IBM

Re: ISREDIT Macro odd request

2025-04-14 Thread Schmitt, Michael
That code won't work if the search string contains an ampersand. Here's my riff on your macro: /* REXX */ address ISREDIT "MACRO (sstring)" "(mylrecl) = LRECL" istring = copies('=',mylrecl) "SCAN OFF" "FIND '&SSTRING' LAST" do while rc = 0 do 3 "LINE_BEFORE .ZCSR = (istring)" end

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Jousma, David
Eric, What I cut/pasted were “good” messages. I was only pointing out to Phil where to go look in the TCPIP STC.When the issue occurred years ago, was when ICSF was still on the customer to start, not autostarted by the OS. Our usual MCL procedure, is to have everything installed, and the

Re: WORM backup tapes block ransomeware attacks?

2025-04-14 Thread Glenn Wilcock
From all of the appends, it's obvious that there are multiple solutions. Looking at the broader topic, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework is an excellent way to create and manage a resilient data framework. IBM offers many tools to support the 5 phases - Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recov

Re: ISREDIT Macro odd request

2025-04-14 Thread Seymour J Metz
I haven't tried it, but it looks good. It could be tightened up, but probably not worth it. --  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread ITschak Mugzach
looks like an ICSF (CSF) issue. ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming soon * nbsp; *|* On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 9:24 PM Jousma, David < 01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Loo

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Jousma, David
Look at the pre-IPL TCPIP STC output, and compare to current. It was the messages in and around here that were bad System SSL: SHA-1 crypto assist is available System SSL: SHA-224 crypto assist is available System SSL: SHA-256 crypto assist is available System SSL: SHA-384 crypto assist is availa

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Phil Smith III
Thanks. This might be the answer, though I may not be able to tell. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 2:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: GSK question AFAIK, there is no shutting off SYSTEM SSL.

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Phil Smith III
Autocorrect munging "TLS" repeatedly? No AT-TLS here. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of ITschak Mugzach Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 2:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: GSK question It depends on how you implement told. If you use at-told,

Re: GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread ITschak Mugzach
It depends on how you implement told. If you use at-told, write a rule to exclude the source, target, or port and refresh at-Tal. If you are using the web enablement, you can use a par to ignore Tal's setup. We use the enablement toolkit and have parm to control the protocol. *| **Itschak Mugzach

GSK question

2025-04-14 Thread Phil Smith III
Is there a way to turn off GSK (System SSL)? We have a customer who had a problem where our STC suddenly wouldn't start: it would try to connect (to a server off z/OS) and that would fail. Connectivity SEEMED ok otherwise, and of course "nothing has changed". A gsktrace produced nothing. After s

ISREDIT Macro odd request

2025-04-14 Thread Steely.Mark
I'm looking for an ISREDIT macro that will search for a specific string within a member. Whenever the string is found, the macro should insert three lines containing only a series of === immediately before the matched line. The macro should continue searching through the entire member

Re: CSM LSS Population

2025-04-14 Thread Steve Estle
Keith, Consolidating always brings to mind performance related questions. Need to look at data usage patters of what is being consolidated (is it mainly system / database / etc. related?). Be careful combining too much active data on single / few volumes ("spindles":-) and ensure active data

Re: WORM backup tapes block ransomeware attacks?

2025-04-14 Thread Russell Witt
Boy, has this topic gotten a LOT of feedback.  First, WORM (or LWORM) is NOT the same as immutable. Since you can still append more data to the tape file OR add additional tape files to the same volume. Now, adding additional files to a tape is not as critical (if the file is not open'ed; the d

Re: How do I enable SMF for TCP/IP Record type 119?

2025-04-14 Thread Mark Regan
Colin, Visit https://www.cbttape.org/contribute.htm Regards, Mark Regan On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:42 AM Colin Paice < 059d4daca697-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Mark, > > If someone can tell me how.. I can put it on the cbttape - I was hoping IBM > would implement it themselves

Re: How do I enable SMF for TCP/IP Record type 119?

2025-04-14 Thread Colin Paice
Plan b) use https://colinpaice.blog/category/wireshark/zwireshark/ on z/OS You can specify an IP address or port, and it produces a wireshark format file which should have the info you need Colin On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 at 11:53, Lindy Mayfield < 05a2ba9c925b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Re: How do I enable SMF for TCP/IP Record type 119?

2025-04-14 Thread Colin Paice
Mark, If someone can tell me how.. I can put it on the cbttape - I was hoping IBM would implement it themselves! Colin On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 at 16:35, Mark Regan < 058035dd6b20-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Colin, > > Do you plan to submit zWireshark so it can be available at cbtta

Re: How do I enable SMF for TCP/IP Record type 119?

2025-04-14 Thread Mark Regan
Colin, Do you plan to submit zWireshark so it can be available at cbttape.org? Where I work, CBT Tape is considered a trusted source. Regards, Mark Regan On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 8:07 AM Colin Paice < 059d4daca697-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Plan b) use https://colinpaice.blog

CSM LSS Population

2025-04-14 Thread k.kri...@comcast.net
We have a client consolidating DS8000 hardware from many devices to a single device. Changing from a 128base/128alias model to a 224base/32 alias model along the way as well. Have defined 160 LSS's to receive 10K-15K volumes. Is there value to spreading out the volume defines across many LSS's or

Re: How do I enable SMF for TCP/IP Record type 119?

2025-04-14 Thread Lindy Mayfield
Thank you Kirk, and to all who answered me. I think I understand it now. Some tcp/ip process I have appears to be opening a listen port, but only briefly I think, so I cannot catch it with a netstat. That leaves me, I think, with two other options, a ctrace, and for me they are a bit of a pita