Here's a quote pulled from an older IBM redbook:
"Note: Dynamic VIPA and Sysplex Distributor capabilities do not rely on data
stored in structures in the Coupling Facility. Therefore, they can be
implemented using XCF communication without a Coupling Facility (also called
Basic Sysplex connecti
Hi David,
would you mind to explain a bit the input data? A single source that hassome separator to indicate a
new member or so (similar to iebupdte input)? Or aset of PDSes? Or??
TIA
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
A legendary post from Sri, from 19 years ago is here to help!
https://www.mvsforums.com/helpboards/viewtopic.php?p=8260
Perhaps I was talking about IEBUPDTE -
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=examples-example-11-create-new-partitioned-data-set
- KB
--- Original Message ---
Hi Paul,
I don't remember the exact thing here but there's a way to flatten PDS files to
a PS.
It'll add things like ./ADDMEMBER or something at the top of each member's
content.
Then, the PS can be used to recreate a PDS. Don't know about PDSEs...
- KB
--- Original Message ---
On Thu
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 02:13:08 +, kekronbekron wrote:
>How about IEBPTPCH? Write out the members as a huge flatfile, and insert
>member building control cards wherever appropriate.
>Then build a PDS from that?
>
Will IEBPTPCH create a PDS(E)? The description and examples I see use
a PDS(E) onl
How about IEBPTPCH? Write out the members as a huge flatfile, and insert member
building control cards wherever appropriate.
Then build a PDS from that?
- KB
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, April 20th, 2023 at 6:46 AM, Paul Gilmartin
<042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
That is what I thought but I get confused since whenever I look at DVIPA
discussions like this
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos-basic-skills?topic=addressing-unique-application-instance-dvipa
it always shows a CF.
But in this preso from IBM at Share
https://share.confex.com/share/125/webprogram
Not 100% sure, but based on this, likely not.
In order for TCP/IP to communicate DVIPA status among LPARs, TCP/IP uses an XCF
group called EZBTCPCS. There's no mention of a coupling facility structure as a
requirement.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Publi
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:49:14 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:44:39 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>I am writing a Rexx Exec (Batch TSO) to build 10,000+ members in a PDS
>>(FB/159/27984).
>>The average member size is 900 lines.
>>
>>In terms of performance, which method sho
Looking at implementing a basic sysplex where an application will be able
to run on two different LPARs but only on one instance at a time.
Since it's difficult to change the advertised IP for the application/LPAR
we plan to use DVIPA.
Is this possible without a coupling facility and only the TCP
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:44:39 -0400, David Spiegel
wrote:
>Hi,
>I am writing a Rexx Exec (Batch TSO) to build 10,000+ members in a PDS
>(FB/159/27984).
>The average member size is 900 lines.
>
>In terms of performance, which method should I use?:
>1) ALLOC ... EXECIO DISKW
>2) LMOPEN ... LMINIT .
Please send me your email address. My email address is
rpinion...@protonmail.com
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, April 19th, 2023 at 2:54 PM, David Spiegel
<0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> I would be
Hi Richard,
I would be interested in obtaining a copy of this.
Thanks and regards,
David
On 2023-04-19 14:41, rpinion865 wrote:
I have a very old assembler program. It was written to extract job log
information from a JES external writer output dataset, and create a member for
each job.
GEN
>> Can you please supply an example, or, point me to a website that has one?
David,
Here is a sample that builds 10 members at a time with each member having 900
lines of data. You can expand that to 1000 members and then have 10 jobs
running at the same time to write out 10,000 members to th
I have a very old assembler program. It was written to extract job log
information from a JES external writer output dataset, and create a member for
each job.
GENEDIT CSECT
*
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:21:58 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>If I understand correctly ...
>"ALLOC F(X) DA('MY.PDS') SH REU"
>
>Do i=1 to n
> "ALLOC F(Y) DA('MY.PDS('member')') SH REU
> "EXECIO * DISKW (FINIS
>End
>
>Is this correct?
>
That's what I remember. But it might be better to remove
Hi Kolusu,
Can you please supply an example, or, point me to a website that has one?
Thanks and regards,
David
On 2023-04-19 14:03, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
3) Something else
DFSORT can do simultaneous member write to PDSE (not PDS) and it will haeve
better performance than rexx.
Thanks,
Kolusu
Hi Gil,
If I understand correctly ...
"ALLOC F(X) DA('MY.PDS') SH REU"
Do i=1 to n
"ALLOC F(Y) DA('MY.PDS('member')') SH REU
"EXECIO * DISKW (FINIS
End
Is this correct?
Thanks and regards,
David
On 2023-04-19 14:10, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:44:39 -0400, David Spiegel
Not the answer to the question you asked but ...
"Performance" has at least two definitions: least elapsed wall clock time and
least CPU utilization.
Another option would be BPXWDYN ... EXECIO DISKW.
Charles
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:44:39 -0400, David Spiegel
wrote:
>Hi,
>I am writing a Rexx
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:44:39 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>I am writing a Rexx Exec (Batch TSO) to build 10,000+ members in a PDS
>(FB/159/27984).
>The average member size is 900 lines.
>
>In terms of performance, which method should I use?:
>1) ALLOC ... EXECIO DISKW
>
Performance is likely to be
>>3) Something else
DFSORT can do simultaneous member write to PDSE (not PDS) and it will haeve
better performance than rexx.
Thanks,
Kolusu
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
Hi,
I am writing a Rexx Exec (Batch TSO) to build 10,000+ members in a PDS
(FB/159/27984).
The average member size is 900 lines.
In terms of performance, which method should I use?:
1) ALLOC ... EXECIO DISKW
2) LMOPEN ... LMINIT ... LMPUT
3) Something else
4) Makes no difference
Thank you in a
I opened an idea on the IBM Idea Portal for this and it was accepted as a
"Future Consideration." For anyone who wants to vote for it, it's ZOS-I-3641.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...
I wrote a certificate management package some years ago on z/OS. I wrote the
package in C using the gsk functions.
IBM stated that the functions couldn't be called directly in assembler.
Regards, Pierre.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 09:01:21 -0700, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>List -
>
>
>
>I am being asked to take one of two actions on a USS file that is part of
>Server Pac
>
>the /etc/security seems to be part of Server pac
>
>
>
So, I don’t know about you, but the /etc that comes from serverpac is not
mo
Kirk, the article talks about dividends at length; in fact, the subhed is:
Dividends have played a significant role in the stock's returns.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:02 AM Kirk Wolf wrote:
> Bill is correct. I would add that the OP also forgets this minor detail:
> https://www.marketbeat.com/st
Bill is correct. I would add that the OP also forgets this minor detail:
https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/IBM/dividend/
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
https://coztoolkit.com
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023, at 9:58 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
> If you had invested 10,000 in Tesla 2 years ago, you’d no
27 matches
Mail list logo
