I would not expect the SLIP WAIT to change primary and secondary.
You can verify that by displaying CR 3 and 4 for the CPU of interest
and comparing it to the CR 3-4 in the IEE844W message.
Jim Mulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Schuste
On 20/5/22 10:03, Tom Brennan wrote:
Since z/OSMF is written in java, then why can't that high-CPU work run
on another platform such as Power or x86, and then communicate with
the mainframe for the z/OS work (i.e. submit jobs or whatever it does
to run the actual installation). Or am I thinkin
On 5/4/2022 2:45 PM, coasthermit wrote:
Many years back I IPLed my onepak system with RACF disabled to see what
happened.Every access of a resource sent a reply prompt to the console for
YES/NO.It took a while but I eventually got enough of MVS up that I could logon
to TSO/E.I considered writi
On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 14:45, Paul Schuster wrote:
>
> I code an IF SLIP with ACTION=WAIT. When it hits, I get the IEE844W message.
> I start the adjunct, and I want to display the storage at the locations
> pointed to by the registers. I use the command
>
> CPU 0 CMD DISPLAY PRI regval.100
>
Thanks again Kurt,
Can a vendor produce product information files without their providing portable
instances for installing the product(s)? Or is that file an artifact of
creating portable instances? It seems like I could theoretically hand-build a
product information file to supply a EOS d
I code an IF SLIP with ACTION=WAIT. When it hits, I get the IEE844W message. I
start the adjunct, and I want to display the storage at the locations pointed
to by the registers. I use the command
CPU 0 CMD DISPLAY PRI regval.100
This works for a register that points to common storage, but fo
Well, small sites may not be sysplex. I'm not, 4 monoplexes.
Even that AUTOSTART(CONNECT) client is going to have some impact
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 10:48 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Su
thanks for that Colin, Looks like some good straight forward info
Carmen
On 5/20/2022 1:18 PM, Colin Paice wrote:
I was told you have a z/OSMF on each instance, so you have availability
but
But once you start a piece of work on one z/OSMF you have to finish it
there, because stuff is not
I was told you have a z/OSMF on each instance, so you have availability
but
But once you start a piece of work on one z/OSMF you have to finish it
there, because stuff is not shard between z/OSMF instances.
Configuration one one z/OSMF may not be shared elsewhere.
One reason that the later ve
Dave,
I do not believe that statement is true as stated. They do expect that you
would run more than one for each *sysplex*, with one of them designated the
Primary and the others as Remote(s).
As I am only running one sysplex at the moment, I only am running one z/OSMF
set of two tasks (IZUAN
replying to myself, just validating what I have seen before - starting
another instance
CWWKE0005E: The runtime environment could not be launched.
CWWKE0029E: An instance of server zosmfServer is already running.
I think some tweaking of parms are needed for me
Carmen
On 5/20/2022 12:47 PM,
I've reviewed the setup and I really don't quite understand, blonde > in a sysplex, why would you need to ?
I've setup a different IZUPRM, my default parm has AUTOSTART(LOCAL) for
prod and AUTOSTART(CONNECT) for my test lpar, but thinking about all I
can do within z/OSMF why would you need to
Not yet mentioned in this thread is that IBM really expects you to run z/OSMF
in all LPARs.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 10:20 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Mark your calendars fo
Great Info Tom, and timely, for me. Sent you an email to your address above,
just to say Hi.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 4:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mark your cale
Similar to my test LPAR, 5 MSU's 8G (min for 2.4) one GP CPU and one
zIIP ALL SHARED - I can start IZUSVR1 (z/OSMF) but it really will not
function in the real world, I just bring it up to test/validate maint or
a new install.
Carmen
On 5/20/2022 11:47 AM, James C wrote:
I run it on a 5
I run it on a 5 msu test lpar 2828 1 cpu. Not the fastest but it works.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I had a lively discussion with Mr. Zelden about zAAP on Main. We ran WAS 3.02
freeware pre zAAP in 2001. CPC was 9672-RB6, 2 way 166 MIPS.When we started the
server address space the lights dimmed. I crowed loudly to IBM about having a
min. requirement for MIPS which came out in a later offerin
I thought I was the only one, for me it's missing the wife's B-day since
it's CRAP - tomorrow, so close after mothers day :(
Thanks for the link, I think I have the PDF somewhere of that same doc
Carmen
On 5/20/2022 11:07 AM, Tom Brennan wrote:
Ha ha - I've setup calendar entries and phone ala
Ha ha - I've setup calendar entries and phone alarms for mine so I don't
forget and get in big trouble.
FYI - Here's the chart I always use for the mainframe dates, in case
anybody here doesn't know about it:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ibm-mainframe-life-cycle-history
On 5/20/2022 8:5
just went back and check - yup, June 30 2020 my wedding anniversary :)
Carmen
On 5/20/2022 10:38 AM, Tom Brennan wrote:
Last microcode update for z13s was June 30, 2020.
z14 dual frame coming up June 30, 2022 and ZR1 Sept 30, 2022
On 5/20/2022 8:29 AM, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
that would be nice
Last microcode update for z13s was June 30, 2020.
z14 dual frame coming up June 30, 2022 and ZR1 Sept 30, 2022
On 5/20/2022 8:29 AM, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
that would be nice - but now with z13 and z13s processors you cannot
even get IBM to perform any hardware changes since those boxes are
EOS.
Agreed that IBM won't give away full zIIP processors. However I don't see it
as a stretch for IBM to allow z/OSMF java work to run on an unlicensed
processor. We haven't started down the z/OSMF path yet so I don't really know
what part of z/OS configuration runs under z/OSMF and what part is s
"At some sites, the most gargantuan thing about making a change like this is
getting past the politics of getting managers who don't want to change
anything." Exactly, and any little burp will be evidence the platform isn't as
reliable as it's cracked up to be and/or that the people administerin
that would be nice - but now with z13 and z13s processors you cannot
even get IBM to perform any hardware changes since those boxes are
EOSI think last June ?
we were somewhat lucky the processors are already IN THE BOX so an MES
of our Z13s was done in May before the EOS date to add a sec
On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 07:59, Jay Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 6:09 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> > Did the MP2000 and MP3000 simulate S/390 on x86 chips, use P/390
> > technology or use tailored hardware?
>
> IIRC, the MP2000 used a P390, and the MP3000 used the P390E. In any event,
Of course a free zIIP would be the best solution. But that's a decision
to be made by sales people, while running z/OSMF remotely would be work
(and maybe even a fun project) for a programmer. Now... which group
would more likely say yes? In my experience, don't even bother trying
to get som
1: I'm being picky and technical, here - I'm sure you both know this - but
the TSO segment's PROC value doesn't tell me what was last used, nor what
procs are allowed, only what would be the default proc the next time the
user logs on. (Maybe RACF checks the proc's ACL before allowing PROC to be
s
When change means being able to more consistently meet your contractual SLA's
and handle ever-increasing client input volume that tends to make the politics
a lot easier. Missed SLA's hit their bottom line, so that's where they tend to
focus.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfra
At some sites, the most gargantuan thing about making a change like this is
getting past the politics of getting managers who don't want to change anything.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 6:53 PM
To: IBM
Out of curiosity, what's the price of one zIIP these days?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 9:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mark your calendars for July 10, 2022 - CustomPac
inten
One would think that since IBM is forcing everybody to use z/OSMF they would
accommodate their own customers and not force their smallest ones into
expensive upgrades just to run this software. As Seymour mentioned, since
zIIPs and the like are all normal processors, IBM should be able to build
IIRC, the MP2000 used a P390, and the MP3000 used the P390E. In any event,
they did not emulate the processor.
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 6:09 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Did the MP2000 and MP3000 simulate S/390 on x86 chips, use P/390
> technology or use tailored hardware?
>
> Since ZAAP (remember
Re: simulate S/390 on x86 chips. Don't think it was x86 technology!
Regards
Parwez Hamid
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: 20 May 2022 12:09
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mark your calendars for July 10, 2022 -
At a very high level and keeping it simple, physically all the 'cores' on the
chip are the same. Depending on what is purchased, these are then
'characterised' as a CP, zIIP, IFL, ICF or a SAP with microcode during POR and
PR/SM designates as to which core will be used for what 'function'.
Rega
Jim - You forgot the "good day" in your closing! ;)
Steve Kocik
z/OS IOS Development
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
For applications using *SAM, it may be a walk in the park for most cases, but
for applications using EXCP it is much more work.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on beh
1. TSO segments will only tell you what is allowed; you still need SMF to tell
how often they are logging on.
2. What about logon procs used for an activity that is only needed at long
intervals?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
__
Did the MP2000 and MP3000 simulate S/390 on x86 chips, use P/390 technology or
use tailored hardware?
Since ZAAP (remember it?) and ZIIP are marketing gimmicks to begin with, IBM
could easilly add one to the mix if they believed that there was a business
case.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http
AFAIK there is nore are no physical differences among the various specialty
engines, just how they are configured after manufacturing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
39 matches
Mail list logo
