On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 07:28:51 +0100, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>So I can't seem to find a way to search *within* a specific book, one KC
>presents me the desired book. Am I missing something?
>
>Lack of this functionality in KC, I need the PDF. Where have the links to the
>PDFs gone?
>
I said here on
So I can't seem to find a way to search *within* a specific book, one KC
presents me the desired book. Am I missing something?
Lack of this functionality in KC, I need the PDF. Where have the links to the
PDFs gone?
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
When I worked with RMF LPAR reports over a decade ago, there was a
maximum number of physical processors for each LPAR, and a weighting
factor, especially for CFs, to limit them to a small part of a whole
processor.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:50 PM, zMan wrote:
> My understanding is that when a sy
Companies like ASG have been playing those games since Allen lost ASG to the
banks and creditors
Any way to squeeze out a buck
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Gould
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 7:28
> —SNIP-
> I was at a client a number of years back where the vendor up and qudrupled
> their license charges, with no increase in features or functionality. The
> client had no choice, as the vendor product was critical, but I let that
> vendor know that we
charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) writes:
> It is hard to prepare for unknown unknowns. It is legendary that people have
> had recovery failures because the fallover switch (channel, power, network,
> whatever) failed.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#13 Check out Massive Amazon cloud
se
Given the following setup -
/etc/auto.master -
/home /etc/default.map
/etc/default.map -
name*
type ZFS
filesystem.ZFS.&SYSNAME
moderdwr
duration 30
delay
On 2/28/2017 9:48 PM, JT wrote:
Has anyone else experienced this?
A vendor for a mainframe data entry product used for the last 30 years (with a
perpetual unlimited seat license) has sent us a contract addendum where they
increase the price by 60+% and include language to change to a MSU based
You may also to wish to look at your ISPF Config function.
make sure the ISPF libraries in there are set up for your new environment.
TSO ISPCCONF
And know what library your ispf configuration is located in
You can also check by using ISPVCALL (enter it twice)
== ISPF Diagnostic Trace Sys
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:00:08 -0700, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>Mark Post wrote:
>> If you don't mind them accessing your system in this way (I have severe
>> doubts about that), just put the key as-is into the target userid's
>> .ssh/authorized_keys file and have them give it a try.
>
>And make sure t
Mark Post wrote:
If you don't mind them accessing your system in this way (I have severe doubts
about that), just put the key as-is into the target userid's
.ssh/authorized_keys file and have them give it a try.
And make sure the dir .ssh is chmod 700 and the authorized_keys file is chmod
60
Thanks Mark and Allan!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Post
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF and public keys
>>> On 3/1/2017 at 02:04 PM, Tracy Adams wrote:
>>> On 3/1/2017 at 02:04 PM, Tracy Adams wrote:
> I have a vendor that sent me a "public" key so they can SFTP into our
> mainframe from a Linux box without have to supply the RACF password. Yes
> they can sign in with a password and all works fine. I am new to RACF and
> loading keys and th
The ".pub" file represents the public key and is simply an ASCII text file. It
should be transferred as a text file.
It needs to eventually end up in /"userid"/ssh/authorizedkeys (not sure of the
spelling, it's in the doc) for the "userid" being used on the MF side.
Beware. The permissions must
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Barry Merrill wrote:
>
> John Deere's data center in the 70s had multiple AC providers but still had
> Midwest lightning
> induced outages, but the data center manager was unsuccessful in installing a
> diesel backup
> system because the only UPS system that met t
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
>
> I can't tell from the message description if it's trying to allocate a new or
> existing dataset. Is S250MWE.SPFTEMP0.CNTL catalogged? can you uncatalog
> it and will it allocate a new one?
>
> Dana
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:01:02
I have a vendor that sent me a "public" key so they can SFTP into our mainframe
from a Linux box without have to supply the RACF password. Yes they can sign
in with a password and all works fine. I am new to RACF and loading keys and
the whole SFTP / ssh thing so bear with me!
When I look at
It is hard to prepare for unknown unknowns. It is legendary that people have
had recovery failures because the fallover switch (channel, power, network,
whatever) failed.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Anne &
My understanding is that when a system is using dynamic LPAR allocation, a
maximum defined capacity for a given LPAR can be set, something less than
the CEC capacity. Anyone know where that's defined (what control block)?
That is, given three LPARs on a 1000 MSU box, each might be allowed a
maximum
Yup, we have gone as far as deleting it, and it does recreate it, but still
gets the error. We have opened an SR with IBM and they have now queued it to
level 2. I'll let everyone know what we find.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Yup, we thought of that and checked the userid in UADS. The unit specified is
3390.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 10:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SM
I can't tell from the message description if it's trying to allocate a new or
existing dataset. Is S250MWE.SPFTEMP0.CNTL catalogged? can you uncatalog it
and will it allocate a new one?
Dana
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:01:02 +, Ward, Mike S wrote:
>We tried that. Same error. I'm going to re
jesse1.robin...@sce.com (Jesse 1 Robinson) writes:
> Our data center folks insist on dual power feeds for everything,
> sometimes infuriatingly so. To test power redundancy, they
> occasionally drop one power feed or the other--with ample heads
> up--and check that all devices are functioning. Othe
John Deere's data center in the 70s had multiple AC providers but still had
Midwest lightning
induced outages, but the data center manager was unsuccessful in installing a
diesel backup
system because the only UPS system that met their power needs was available
ONLY with a
Caterpillar Diesel en
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:02:47 -0800, Charles Mills (charl...@mcn.org)
wrote about "Re: Check out Massive Amazon cloud service outage disrupts
sites" (in <04c101d292ad$a751f750$f5f5e5f0$@mcn.org>):
[snip]
> Up here in northern CA we used to joke that PG&E's company song
> should be the Simon & Garfun
I heard about a major electric utility that had an influential VP who believed
that it was 'unseemly' for the company to spend money on backup power. Sort
dissing their own product. He blocked all efforts to install diesel generators.
Thankfully he is long gone. A major multi-state event in the
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:37:27 -0600, Dana Mitchell wrote:
>If it's any help, as a temporary workaround in situations like this, use the
>TSO SUBMIT command, it won't try to allocate an SPFTEMPx. file.
>
>TSO SUB DATASET.NAME(MEMBER)
>
That may require that you SAVE the member, which you may not
One of the manuals I use is
z/OS DFSMS Implementing System-Managed Storage
Lots of information on how things work and samples. I think there is also a
sample in SYS1.SAMPLIB. I have not verified that, but I think there is
something called a starter set.
Lizette
> -Original Message--
And you're in the electric power BUSINESS!
Up here in northern CA we used to joke that PG&E's company song should be the
Simon & Garfunkel "Hello Darkness my Old Friend."
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jess
I did not notice if anyone mentioned this. Every TSO userid definition--whether
RACF or UADS--contains a default DASD unit specification. This long predates
SMS. If you're allocating a data set explicitly, you can override the unit
name, but implicit allocations depend on having at least one vol
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:27 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Sample ACS routine
>
> Hi
>
> Would someone help me with a sample STOGROUP, DATACLA
Our data center folks insist on dual power feeds for everything, sometimes
infuriatingly so. To test power redundancy, they occasionally drop one power
feed or the other--with ample heads up--and check that all devices are
functioning. Other than call-home events, we have not had any surprises s
We tried that. Same error. I'm going to research what the others have
recommended and see what we come up with. Thanks everyone for the reply's.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Doug
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:
Or 3.4
SUB next to the member
That way you can do multiple members
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 7:53 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SM
Will look into that. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Matthew Stitt
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS Routines help
That indicates you need to modify your
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 8:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS Routines help
If it's any help, as a temporary workaround in situ
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the input.
Regards,
Srinivas G
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Craig Bakken
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.2 Question
We saw a 2X incre
If it's truly a perpetual, unlimited-seat license, "No" is the correct
answer, and the vendor gets sleaze points for trying an end-run. If there's
a weasel clause, you may be SOL.
Will be very interested to hear how this plays out.
P.S. Would not be the first time a vendor (software or otherwise)
If it's any help, as a temporary workaround in situations like this, use the
TSO SUBMIT command, it won't try to allocate an SPFTEMPx. file.
TSO SUB DATASET.NAME(MEMBER)
Dana
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:52:43 +, Ward, Mike S wrote:
>Because doing a TSO/PDF submit we keep getting these error
>Ah, probably happened when the floor maintenance technician (janitor
inold-speak) repurposed a electrical outlet.
Usually large datacenters test their emergency procedures (at least once
a year) - unfortunately the redundant power supply does not always work.
And some servers might not resu
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Edward Finnell <
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> The notice says check the Dashboard for updates. They seem to have one or
> two of these a year. So far they've been pretty tight lipped about it.
>
>
Ah, probably happened when the floor ma
Yes. Several times with CA (back when there were numerous alternatives).
Tell the vendor NO.
Honor the contract and receive some revenue, or force the addendum and receive
no revenue!
Has anyone else experienced this?
A vendor for a mainframe data entry product used for the last 30 years (with
Hi
Would someone help me with a sample STOGROUP, DATACLAS and STORCLAS.
I.am trying to create ACS routine for one of my sandbox.
Just trying to push a USERID allocation to a SMS volume
Nathan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signo
Mount a volume as public
Regards,
Doug
.
On Feb 28, 2017, at 17:52, Ward, Mike S wrote:
Because doing a TSO/PDF submit we keep getting these errors, and we believe it
is an SMS probem.
,IKJ56221I DATA SET S250MWE.SPFTEMP0.CNTL NOT ALLOCATED, VOLUME NOT AVAILABLE+,
,IKJ56221I VOLUME NECESSARY
44 matches
Mail list logo
