Radoslaw,
Sounds somewhat like a problem I encountered while installing our EC12.
Importing the file from USB would appear to work but got an error during the
validate.
Looking for my doc.
As I recall, it was related to never having any configuration on the OSA-ICC
PCHID .
Can you manually, with
Hi folks
I'm bringing up an old Multiprise 3000 - 7060-30. For fun and
education rather than production needless to say!
All is mostly well so far but I'm having a problem configuring the
internal DASD. There are 11 18GB disks in there and 7 SSA jumpers. The
loop and plugging rules appear to be c
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:08:37 -0600, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>
>I'm not sure if an ssh invocation of pax like this works in all cases.
>Certainly z/OS to non-z/OS it would not work since, by default, ssh exec
>sessions are translated EBCDIC/ASCII and vice versa in the z/OS OpenSSH
>implementations. I wou
Here's the CVE: *CVE-2015-5600*
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/173
z/OS OpenSSH doesn't support keyboard-interative authentication, so this
particular brute force attack on passwords would not apply anyway.
I'll also point out a couple of things:
1) All popular security software has defect
I ported rsync-2.5.5 a few years ago:
Below and attached is the diff from the original rsync-2.5.5.tar.gz.
I also created /usr/local/bin/rsync.sh since we put rsync in a non-standard
location:
---
http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/07/bug-in-widely-used-openssh-opens-servers-to-password-cracking/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subje
Gil,
I'm not sure if an ssh invocation of pax like this works in all cases.
Certainly z/OS to non-z/OS it would not work since, by default, ssh exec
sessions are translated EBCDIC/ASCII and vice versa in the z/OS OpenSSH
implementations. I would have to check, but this seems unlikely to be
binar
Gil,
Thanks for the correction. I was thinking if he was doing a one-time move he
could mount a filesystem on the originating LPAR, do the pax command, dismount,
and then mount again on the receiving LPAR. Cumbersome, but works for a one
time move.
If it is going to be an ongoing process then
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:12:05 +, Skeldum, William wrote:
>The pax command is a good choice because it can copy all files, directories,
>and symbolic links in a directory using a single command without overlaying
>any existing files. For example:
>cd /Service/ZOS113/var
>pax -rvwk -pe * /var
>
> ... However, OpenSSH has had security issues IIRC. ...
What security issues are those?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> An example: which of these code sequences do you suppose runs faster?
>
> la rX,0(rI,rBase) rX -> array[i]
> lg rY,0(,rX)rY = array[i]
> agsi 0(rX),1++array[i]
> * Now do something with rY
>
> vs:
> lg rY,0(rI,rBase) rY = a
Dave,
a long time ago I looked at the source code of rsync and it is no trivial task
to port it to an ebcdic platform (at least it was). A colleague of me was so
frustrated too that he wrote a command line tool and a daemon that can be used
to sync directories using the "rsync algorithm", but u
I have problems with OSA-ICC configuration panels on HMC 2.13.0
Source file cannot be validated deu to "Unknown error", panel options
also do not work.
Has anyone experienced such problems?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronio
The pax command is a good choice because it can copy all files, directories,
and symbolic links in a directory using a single command without overlaying any
existing files. For example:
cd /Service/ZOS113/var
pax -rvwk -pe * /var
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L
Hi, I have been working with IBM to identify how to move a USS directory that
has files and subdirectories to a different LPAR. They said Ported Tools and
the scp command. However, OpenSSH has had security issues IIRC. The other
thing they mentioned was to port rsync over to z/OS. I also ha
In <3361710c8fdd49d9a5ba76a61a993...@su806104.ad.ing.net>, on
12/28/2015
at 06:15 AM, "Windt, W.K.F. van der (Fred)"
said:
>And on newer machines (with the general-instructions-extension) you
>can simply do:
> ASI COUNTER,1
>I assume it is faster than the sequence of three instructi
Back from Christmas break to a lot of responses - thanks to all. Summarizing
the responses thus far:
* Select and/or tune your algorithm first.
Check.
* Tuning for a specific machine is a bad idea because you'll have to retune for
every new machine.
Check. This code is sufficiently critical t
As Tom has noted, the most dramatic performance enhancements typically
come from a change in strategy or algorithm used. In my experience you
get better results by looking for ways to accomplish the end result by
having the program do fewer actions rather than concentrating on
micro-optimzing the
18 matches
Mail list logo