Re: [10] RFR 8180469: Wrong short form text for supplemental Japanese era

2017-09-08 Thread Mitsuru Matsushima
Hi, Naoto-san, Oh, I think I had misunderstood the behavior of COMPAT Provider. COMPAT Provider provide values, each of them are the same form as Supplemental Era, right? I think the value I wrote before are wrong at Short form of COMPAT (DateTimeFormatter). Is there no inconsistency, isn't it

Re: [10] RFR 8180469: Wrong short form text for supplemental Japanese era

2017-09-08 Thread Naoto Sato
Yes, I believe that's correct. Only inconsistency (outside of supplementary era support) is that "G" pattern for SimpleDateFormat outputs differently between COMPAT provider and CLDR provider, e.g., COMPAT returns "H" and CLDR returns "Heisei", which comes from CLDR data using "Heisei" for "ab