Sorry, I did not know the mailing list strips out attachments.
(Thanks for telling me, Martin.)
I try to write down the test code and comparison table image below.
At the Comparison table, I added the "Supplemental Era" behavior and
"Expected?" behavior.
Japanese usually use '平' or 'H' for abbre
Hi Matsushima-san,
Thank you for the further information on the issue. I attached your
observation in the bug report. I will fix it along with the supplemental
era's short name inconsistency.
Naoto
On 6/22/17 1:36 PM, Mitsuru Matsushima wrote:
At the Comparison table, I added the "Supplem
Hi Sato-san,
Thank you for your response.
Sorry for teaching you the wrong issue number.
(However, it seems you handled fine...)
wrong: JDK-8048123
correct: JDK-8180469
Mitsuru
> -Original Message-
> From: Naoto Sato [mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 7:1
Hi,
I found an issue about "jdk.calendar.sypplemental.era" system property.
According toJavadoc of JapaneseImperialCalendar, the system property can
specify "since" parameter as UTC time.
However, on using UTC time, the first year of new era is skipped.
The new era start with a second year as f
Hi Matsushita-san,
I will look into it. Could you please file an issue about this?
Naoto
On 6/22/17 6:20 PM, Mitsuru Matsushima wrote:
Hi,
I found an issue about "jdk.calendar.sypplemental.era" system property.
According toJavadoc of JapaneseImperialCalendar, the system property can specify
Hi Naoto-san,
Thank you for your response.
I reported this issue to bugreport.java.com now.
---
Mitsuru
> -Original Message-
> From: Naoto Sato [mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 8:39 AM
> To: Matsushima Mitsuru(松島 充) ;
> i18n-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject:
