Hi Thomas,
It looks like NAME_MAX is not defined on Solaris and breaks the build on
Solaris. [1]
An alternative would be to conditionally use PATH_MAX.
But I think it would be reasonable to just remove the use of NAME_MAX,
since the following
code increases the value to at least 1024, whic
Please review a fix for build breakage on Solaris.
The NAME_MAX value does not seem to add much value in this case and is
not defined on all supported platforms.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-max-8166148/
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166148
Thanks,
+1
Naoto
On 9/15/16 12:16 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Please review a fix for build breakage on Solaris.
The NAME_MAX value does not seem to add much value in this case and is
not defined on all supported platforms.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-max-8166148/
Issue:
https:/
Hi Roger,
Thank you for taking care of this! Fix looks fine.
Kind Regards, Thomas
On Thursday, 15 September 2016, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Please review a fix for build breakage on Solaris.
> The NAME_MAX value does not seem to add much value in this case and is not
> defined on all supported plat