> Thanks for looking into the Unicode support issues in Java RegEx.
> Since you have been working on Unicode in the past decade, I'm sure
> you understand that most of the issues you are pointing out here
> belongs to the "Extended Unicode Support: Level 2" as documented in
> UTS#18 Unicode Regula
Here's the first requirement that must be met to claim Level 1 compliance.
Java does not yet meet this requirement, but it could easily do so: indeed,
my own regex-rewriting library implements this requirement. It takes very
little code at all and is *completely* backwards compatible because it u
Tom Christiansen wrote:
:
[1] http://download.java.net/jdk7/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html
Is the source for that available? If it were, I'm sure many
questions I have I could easily answer myself.
Have you cloned the forest? If so then it's in
jdk/src/share/classes/java/ut
I've just cleared still more dynamic blacklist entry for Oracle's MX
servers, including rcsinet11.oracle.com [148.87.113.123]. If someone
from within Oracle could please send me mail, I'd like to test that
the way here is truly cleared again.
This is happening because you have a compromised ma
Tom,
Introducing in the new perl style \x{...} as the hexadecimal notation
appears to be
a nice-to-have enhancement (I will file a RFE to put this request in
record). But I
don't think you can simply deny that the Java Unicode escape sequences
for UTF16
is NOT A "mechanism"/notation for specif
Yes, all my emails, including the last one I just sent out minutes ago,
are bounced back
with the following error message.
-Sherman
-
The original message was received at Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:26:53 GMT
from rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]
- The following ad
