+1
On 2016/05/30 8:15, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Other than the copyright year things, all looks good to me. I don't
think further review is required for copyright update.
Masayoshi
On 5/28/2016 3:25 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi Rachna,
Here are my comments to the webrev (I am assuming the tool t
Other than the copyright year things, all looks good to me. I don't
think further review is required for copyright update.
Masayoshi
On 5/28/2016 3:25 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi Rachna,
Here are my comments to the webrev (I am assuming the tool that
extracts JavaTime*.java are working correctl
Hi Rachna,
Here are my comments to the webrev (I am assuming the tool that extracts
JavaTime*.java are working correctly, i.e., have not reviewed the data
itself):
- (All JavaTime*.java files): Unicode copyright notice is outdated. It
should include the one that has "1991-2016" as the copyri
Hi all,
Please review fix for JDK-8145136.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145136
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/rachna/CLDR29/8145136/webrev.00/
Fix: Currently JDK supports CLDR V27 which is upgraded to latest version 29.
For more info: http://cldr.unicode.org
Hello all,
Please review the fix for JDK-8145136.
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145136
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rgoel/cldr28/webrev.00/
Fix: Upgraded CLDR data from Version 27 to 28.
More information at : http://cldr.unicode.org/
--
Thanks,
Rachna
