Hi,
On 09/23/2010 02:20 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
OK, I created 6986968 for this. It will show up in the external bug
database soon.
Thanks! I have pushed the changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/swing/jdk/rev/bbadb9484f53
Cheers,
Omair
OK, I created 6986968 for this. It will show up in the external bug
database soon.
Naoto
(9/22/10 10:55 PM), Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 14:53, Naoto Sato wrote:
Also, is it possible to get a bug id for this?
I am not familiar with this process, but according to this pa
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 14:53, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Also, is it possible to get a bug id for this?
>
> I am not familiar with this process, but according to this page
> (http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/), you can create a new bug report in
> the OpenJDK Bugzilla.
An Oracle sponsor still needs
(9/22/10 7:09 AM), Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
On 09/21/2010 01:40 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Looks good to me.
Naoto
Thanks for the review. Should I use the swing forest to push this change
(which I believe is what the i18n group uses) or the awt forest?
Swing forest is just fine.
Also, is it po
Hi,
On 09/21/2010 01:40 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Looks good to me.
Naoto
Thanks for the review. Should I use the swing forest to push this change
(which I believe is what the i18n group uses) or the awt forest?
Also, is it possible to get a bug id for this?
Thanks,
Omair
(9/20/10 7:33 AM)
Looks good to me.
Naoto
(9/20/10 7:33 AM), Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Naoto Sato writes:
Thank you for catching the error. I think your fix is fine but would
like some comments noting that the extra call to getX11InputMethodData()
in DestroyXIMCallback is merely to free up the pX11IMData, other
Hi,
Naoto Sato writes:
>
> Thank you for catching the error. I think your fix is fine but would
> like some comments noting that the extra call to getX11InputMethodData()
> in DestroyXIMCallback is merely to free up the pX11IMData, otherwise,
> the call is kind of cryptic.
>
Thanks for revi
