2020/12/4 6:08:13 -0800, er...@openjdk.java.net:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 12:30:02 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> And I can certainly move jdwp.spec to java.base instead. That's the
>>> reason I need input on this: All I know is that is definitely not
>>> the responsibility of the Build Group to maintai
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:16:23 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> The change is (just) to remove legacy usages of a JDK-private custom tag.
As the creator of these tags many moons ago, I approve this change.
-
Marked as reviewed by mr (Lead).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/81
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/327
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/314
- Mark
2016/12/21 14:47:45 -0800, mark.reinh...@oracle.com:
> Naoto Sato was recently voted in as the new Lead of the
> Internationalization Group [1].
>
> Governing Board members: Please vote on whether to ratify this change,
> as required by the Bylaws [2]. Votes are due in two weeks, by 23:00
> UTC o
2016/6/9 8:26:32 -0700, mark.reinh...@oracle.com:
> Naoto Sato recently resigned as the Lead of the Internationalization
> Group [1]. Masayoshi Okutsu was voted in as the new Group Lead shortly
> thereafter [2].
>
> Governing Board members: Please vote on whether to ratify this change,
> as requi
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/267
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/252
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/227
- Mark
New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/226
- Mark
2012/9/10 14:26 -0700, michael.f...@oracle.com:
> I have updated the webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/7196354/webrev.01/
>
> ...
>
> I am also moving the file from root of source tree to
> jdk/make/jdk.tbom. SGT strongly recommends we follow the standard file
> naming convention used b
2012/9/5 14:08 -0700, michael.f...@oracle.com:
> Please help to review the new JDK8 file for the following CR:
> 7196354 check-in jdk.tbom file to openjdk repo
>
> The webrev is located at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/7196354/webrev.00/
This file needs a more descriptive name, especially
2012/8/29 14:00 -0700, scolebou...@joda.org:
> I object to the implementation of this change, specifically the date format -
> "The format of date must be {@code '-MM-dd-HH-mm-ss'}"
>
> There seems to be no reason not to use the standard ISO-8601 format
> here - -MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss
I agree.
2012/3/5 15:04 -0800, darryl.mo...@oracle.com:
> this JEP has been canceled in favor of JSR-310, which will reduce the time
> zone data in a different way.
Okay. I've moved 151 to withdrawn.
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/151
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/133
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/128
- Mark
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/127
- Mark
18 matches
Mail list logo