ace wrote:
Any takers ? Jay ? Also adding i18n-dev.
-phil.
On 4/20/19 4:29 PM, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208179
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8208179/index.html
The original complaint is missing devanagari in logical fonts in Oracle JDK 11.
I r
estion and please find the updated webrev at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dkumar/8202696/webrev.03/ .
Request you to have a look at it again and let me know your comments.
Thanks,
Dipak
-Original Message-
From: Naoto Sato
Sent: 21 June 2018 22:52
To: Dipak Kumar; Philip Race;
2d-...@openjd
My question has not been answered. I don't think this is ready to go in.
-phil.
On 6/20/18, 4:23 AM, Ichiroh Takiguchi wrote:
Hello.
New fixed code is in:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aleonard/defvis/webrev.02/
Could you check fixed files again ?
I only updated following part between webrev.0
, 8:17 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
The changes looks fine, should we increment version=1 to other version
or it is not used? Unrelated question is how we validate all these
paths if some of them are absent?
On 23.09.16 8:08, Philip Race wrote:
PING .. any takers on this two week old RFR ?
-phil
PING .. any takers on this two week old RFR ?
-phil.
On 9/8/16, 1:12 PM, Philip Race wrote:
[Fix i18n-dev address]
-phil.
On 9/8/16, 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/
Solaris 10 is not
[Fix i18n-dev address]
-phil.
On 9/8/16, 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/
Solaris 10 is not supported by JDK 9.
This updates the fontconfig file to focus on the default set of fonts
installed on
