Re: RFR 8209184: JDK8 ResourceBundle vulnerable to GC (fix included)

2018-08-17 Thread Adam Farley8
Hi Mandy, The extra space is fine. In hindsight, you could probably rename "loaderone" to just "loader" too. Thanks for helping with this. :) Best Regards Adam Farley OpenJDK Team Runtimes IBM mandy chung wrote on 16/08/2018 18:57:01: > From: mandy chung &

Re: RFR 8209184: JDK8 ResourceBundle vulnerable to GC (fix included)

2018-08-16 Thread Adam Farley8
chung wrote on 15/08/2018 17:49:51: > From: mandy chung > To: Adam Farley8 , Hans Boehm > Cc: core-libs-dev , i18n-dev@openjdk.java.net > Date: 15/08/2018 17:50 > Subject: Re: RFR 8209184: JDK8 ResourceBundle vulnerable to GC (fix included) > > Hi Adam, > > Thi

Re: RFR 8209184: JDK8 ResourceBundle vulnerable to GC (fix included)

2018-08-15 Thread Adam Farley8
m>> wrote: > > > > Hi Adam, > > > > Have you tried Peter's suggestion if an empty static method taking an > > Object parameter? Does it work for you? > > > > Your proposed approach seems fine and I would suggest to put the >

Information Request: supplementalData.xml's extra long line

2018-04-24 Thread Adam Farley8
Hi All, Could someone please take a look at line 5144 in supplementalData.xml, and tell me what it's meant to be for? http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/c71f40e37583/src/jdk.localedata/share/classes/sun/util/cldr/resources/common/supplemental/supplementalData.xml There's a lot of data on t