Re: RFR: JDK-8276447 Deprecate finalization-related methods for removal [v3]

2021-12-01 Thread Stuart Marks
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:23:59 GMT, Brent Christian wrote: >> Here are the code changes for the "Deprecate finalizers in the standard Java >> API" portion of JEP 421 ("Deprecate Finalization for Removal") for code >> review. >> >> This change makes the indicated deprecations, and updates the API

Re: RFR: JDK-8276447 Deprecate finalization-related methods for removal [v3]

2021-12-01 Thread Brent Christian
> Here are the code changes for the "Deprecate finalizers in the standard Java > API" portion of JEP 421 ("Deprecate Finalization for Removal") for code > review. > > This change makes the indicated deprecations, and updates the API spec for > JEP 421. It also updates the relevant @SuppressWarn

Re: RFR: JDK-8276447 Deprecate finalization-related methods for removal [v2]

2021-12-01 Thread Brent Christian
> Here are the code changes for the "Deprecate finalizers in the standard Java > API" portion of JEP 421 ("Deprecate Finalization for Removal") for code > review. > > This change makes the indicated deprecations, and updates the API spec for > JEP 421. It also updates the relevant @SuppressWarn

Integrated: 8177819: DateTimeFormatterBuilder zone parsing should recognise DST

2021-12-01 Thread Naoto Sato
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:00:58 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > This fix intends to honor the type (std/dst/generic) of parsed zone name for > selecting the offset at the overlap. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: a363b7b9 Author:Naoto Sat

Re: RFR: 8277398: javac does not accept encoding name COMPAT [v2]

2021-12-01 Thread Naoto Sato
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 08:49:09 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi wrote: > But it's not easy to pick up right locale/platform encoding name except for > well known users. JEP 400 has the example to get the encoding name as a one liner: java -XshowSettings:properties -version 2>&1 | grep file.encoding (rep

Re: RFR: 8177819: DateTimeFormatterBuilder zone parsing should recognise DST [v4]

2021-12-01 Thread Stephen Colebourne
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:41:34 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> This fix intends to honor the type (std/dst/generic) of parsed zone name for >> selecting the offset at the overlap. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted. > > Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > co

Re: RFR: 8277398: javac does not accept encoding name COMPAT [v2]

2021-12-01 Thread Ichiroh Takiguchi
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:29:03 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> As I explained before, output file encoding which is created by `-Xstdout` >> option is changed to native encoding instead of UTF-8 by >> `-J-Dfile.encoding=COMPAT`. >> In case of Linux ja_JP.eucjp locale, your explanation may be acceptable

Withdrawn: 8277398: javac does not accept encoding name COMPAT

2021-12-01 Thread Ichiroh Takiguchi
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 07:00:44 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi wrote: > ncoding name COMPAT was defined for operating system encoding by JEP-400. > https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/400 > But java does not accept "-encoding COMPAT". This pull request has been closed without being integrated. - P