On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:19:20 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the fix to the subject issue. It is not actually related to
> "parenthesized", but period-comma sequence was regarded as a break on a
> backward traverse.
Marked as reviewed by joehw (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> Kind regards,
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webre
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:54:35 GMT, Sebastian Stenzel
wrote:
>> When we do
>> byte b1 = (byte) (value & 0xFF);
>> we keep from int only 1 lower byte and exactly the same can be achieved with
>> plain cast. See the test below:
>> public class Main {
>> public static void main(String[] args) throw
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:16:29 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
> When we do
> byte b1 = (byte) (value & 0xFF);
> we keep from int only 1 lower byte and exactly the same can be achieved with
> plain cast. See the test below:
> public class Main {
> public static void main(String[] args) throws Excepti
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 06:56:00 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Nothing outside of the JDK should be hacking into this private field of a
>> non-exposed class, this should not be a concern here.
>
>> @AlanBateman so is it ok to keep `ArrayLists`?
>
> One thing to look out for is usages of 2-arg add me
When we do
byte b1 = (byte) (value & 0xFF);
we keep from int only 1 lower byte and exactly the same can be achieved with
plain cast. See the test below:
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
IntStream.range(Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MAX_VALUE).forEach
