On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:26:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Looks like it's never specified in JavaDoc which particular implementation
>> of List is used in fields of affected classes, so it's quite odd to me that
>> someone would rely on that when using reflection. But your point about
>> backwa
Hi all,
could you please review this trivial cleanup?
from JBS:
> jtreg `@modules X` directive does two things:
> - exclude a test from execution if JDK under test doesn't have module X
> - if JDK under test has module X, make sure it's resolved
>
> both these things have no sense for `java
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:26:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Looks like it's never specified in JavaDoc which particular implementation
>> of List is used in fields of affected classes, so it's quite odd to me that
>> someone would rely on that when using reflection. But your point about
>> backwa
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:18:11 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
>> If that's the only use case, I recommend changing the return type to a
>> deque, and replace the linked list with an array deque instead (as done
>> elsewhere in this pr)
>
> Looks like it's never specified in JavaDoc which particular
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 15:02:03 GMT, liach
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/loader/URLClassPath.java line 220:
>>
>>> 218: return Collections.emptyList();
>>> 219: }
>>> 220: List result = new ArrayList<>();
>>
>> We'd better be cautious about this re
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 14:58:11 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> The usage of `LinkedList` is senseless and can be replaced with either
>> `ArrayList` or `ArrayDeque` which are both more compact and effective.
>>
>> jdk:tier1 and jdk:tier2 are both ok
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/loader/URLC
The usage of `LinkedList` is senseless and can be replaced with either
`ArrayList` or `ArrayDeque` which are both more compact and effective.
jdk:tier1 and jdk:tier2 are both ok
-
Commit messages:
- Remove remaining usages of LinkedList in java.base
Changes: https://git.openjdk.ja
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:32:57 GMT, liach
wrote:
> Are linked lists worse for addition even in cases where addition to array
> list or deque requires resize and copying? i thought that's the advantage of
> linked list.
As far as I know `LinkedList` is always worse than `ArrayList` and discourag
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:48:33 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
> The usage of `LinkedList` is senseless and can be replaced with either
> `ArrayList` or `ArrayDeque` which are both more compact and effective.
>
> jdk:tier1 and jdk:tier2 are both ok
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/loader/URL
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:48:33 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов
wrote:
> The usage of `LinkedList` is senseless and can be replaced with either
> `ArrayList` or `ArrayDeque` which are both more compact and effective.
>
> jdk:tier1 and jdk:tier2 are both ok
Are linked lists worse for addition even in cases w
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:43:33 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
>> implementation of
>> JDK-8256145: JEP 398: Deprecate the Applet API for Removal
>
> Marked as reviewed by almatvee (Committer).
Have you looked at narrowing the use of the SuppressWarnings to local variable
declarations to avoid add
11 matches
Mail list logo
