Re: [10] RFR: 8187946 : Support ISO 4217 Amendments 163 and 164

Hi Naoto, Thank you for review. - Added the updates for currency names, removed the cut-over time for STN. - For compatibility reason, we don't update the historic currencies. Test passed. Please find the revised webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ljiang/8187946/webrev.01/ Thanks, Leo On 0

Re: ResourceBundleControlProvider replacement for java 9?

Let me try to see if I understand your situation correctly. On 1/12/18 12:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: All are com.company.* Assuming service packages use a resource bundle. team1, team2, team3 all uses a resource bundle.  Let's say com.company.team1.service calls ResourceBundle.get

Re: ResourceBundleControlProvider replacement for java 9?

On 1/12/18 11:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hello Comments inline Le 12 janv. 2018 20:07, "mandy chung" > a écrit : Hi Romain, I expect no impact to the translation process. Can you give an example of one resource bundle and its packaged artifa

Re: ResourceBundleControlProvider replacement for java 9?

Hi Romain, I expect no impact to the translation process. Can you give an example of one resource bundle and its packaged artifact and where the localized bundles are packaged? As Naoto suggests, it would be helpful to migrate one resource bundle to ResourceBundleProvider as an exercise that

Re: ResourceBundleControlProvider replacement for java 9?

I was under the impression that the libraries you mentioned were from third parties that you cannot get access to the source. Looks like it's not that case, so I still believe you can migrate your applications and libraries with ResourceBundleProvider. Would you prototype migrating your app and