Hi Masayoshi,
Just a thought. What if RB.clearCache(classLoader) was specified as
equivalent to RB.clearCache(classLoader.getUnnamedModule()) ?
I think that would be backwards compatible...
Regards, Peter
On 08/02/2016 05:30 PM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for bringing up the
On 08/04/2016 11:21 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
If the providing module declares the service type, then the consuming
module will have an explicit dependency on the providing module, which
also defeats the purpose of service provider's implicit coupling.
I take this back. The service type is reso
Hi,
I would like to ask about why java.util.spi.ResourceBundleProvider is
designed they way it is. I'm questioning the design of the following
part of specification:
"The provider service type is determined by {@code
basename+"Provider"}."
Why is that necessary? It requires that provid
