+1
On 2016/05/30 8:15, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Other than the copyright year things, all looks good to me. I don't
think further review is required for copyright update.
Masayoshi
On 5/28/2016 3:25 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi Rachna,
Here are my comments to the webrev (I am assuming the tool t
+1
On 2016/05/30 15:04, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Looks good to me.
Masayoshi
On 5/30/2016 3:00 PM, Nishit Jain wrote:
Hi,
Please review the fix for JDK-8158025.
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8158025/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158025
Fix: corre
Looks good to me.
Masayoshi
On 5/30/2016 3:00 PM, Nishit Jain wrote:
Hi,
Please review the fix for JDK-8158025.
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8158025/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158025
Fix: corrected a small typo in Locale.java.
Regards,
Nishi
Hi,
Please review the fix for JDK-8158025.
Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nishjain/8158025/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158025
Fix: corrected a small typo in Locale.java.
Regards,
Nishit Jain
Hi,
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
--
Yuka
On 2016/05/30 14:05, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Hi,
Please review the fix for JDK-8039565. I don't think it's worth
keeping this old test and decided to remove it.
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039565
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk
Hi,
Please review the fix for JDK-8039565. I don't think it's worth keeping
this old test and decided to remove it.
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039565
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/8039565/webrev.00
Thanks,
Masayoshi
Other than the copyright year things, all looks good to me. I don't
think further review is required for copyright update.
Masayoshi
On 5/28/2016 3:25 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi Rachna,
Here are my comments to the webrev (I am assuming the tool that
extracts JavaTime*.java are working correctl