The fix looks Okay to me. But there should be a regression test for this
particular case? I wonder if we can have a test case to verify width(s)
of monospaced glyphs.
Masayoshi
On 3/18/2016 4:54 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I think you are still waiting on i18n to reply here since the
exclusion rang
Hi,
There are couple regex related changes waiting for review. I have pull them
together here (with the notes) to make it easy to review.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/regexBackTrack.Lamnda.CanonEQ/webrev/
(1) Exponential backtracking
Note:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/regexBackT
Hi,
While still waiting patiently for the review for
RFR: Regex exponential backtracking issue [1]
RFR: Regex exponential backtracking issue --- more cleanup/tuning [2]
Here is the third round of change to address the "broken canonical
equivalent support"
issue listed in JEP-111 [3] .
Canoni