Hi,
ok, (I still think of import is for code, not docs, but it makes the
{@link}s easier).
Roger
On 12/14/2015 10:53 AM, Ramanand Patil wrote:
RE: Review request for JDK-8066982: ZonedDateTime.parse()
returns wrong ZoneOffset around DST fall transition
Hi Roger,
The added import in Dat
Hi Roger,
The added import in DateTimeFormatter.java is because of the javadocs entry -
{@link ChronoLocalDateTime#atZone(ZoneId)}
Regards,
Ramanand.
From: Roger Riggs
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 8:36 PM
To: Ramanand Patil; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc: i18n-dev@openjdk.java
Hi Ramanand,
Thanks for the cleanup of the test.
On 12/14/2015 3:14 AM, Ramanand Patil wrote:
RE: Review request for JDK-8066982: ZonedDateTime.parse()
returns wrong ZoneOffset around DST fall transition
Hi Rogerand all,
Please review the updated
Webrev:_http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/ram
Looks good to me.
Masayoshi
On 12/14/2015 6:29 PM, Naveen Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
Please review the following fix for jdk9.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139572
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/naveen/8139572/webrev.00/
issue description:
SimpleDateFormat wi
Hi All,
Please review the following fix for jdk9.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139572
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/naveen/8139572/webrev.00/
issue description:
SimpleDateFormat with "stand-alone" month format " " and locate
ru_RU throw java.tex
I remain happy with the webrev
Stephen
On 14 December 2015 at 08:14, Ramanand Patil wrote:
> Hi Roger and all,
>
> Please review the updated Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/ramanand/8066982/webrev.02/
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066982
>
>
> Roger, please see my
The added text and tests represent a spec clarification. The behaviour
in this area was not precisely defined before. The bug itself was
clear due to the expected round-trip behaviour of toString() and
parse(). While this is a slightly more tricky backport than some, it
is really quite broken in on
Hi Roger and all,
Please review the updated Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/ramanand/8066982/webrev.02/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066982
Roger, please see my comments about new tests:
- All my test methods were earlier generic with main method and hence had
priva
