Hello,
Please help to review the changes for the following CR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6192407
The webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/6192407/
thanks,
-michael
Looks good to me.
Naoto
On 10/29/13, 2:32 PM, Michael Fang wrote:
Hello,
Please help to review the changes (1 line fix) for the following CR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025521
The webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8025521/
The fix has been tested in a
Hello,
Please help to review the changes (1 line fix) for the following CR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025521
The webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8025521/
The fix has been tested in a private build.
thanks,
-michael
Looks good to me.
Naoto
On 10/29/13, 2:08 PM, Michael Fang wrote:
Hello,
Please help to review the changes (1 line fix) for the following CR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8008647
The webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8008647/
The webrev doesn't show anyt
Hello,
Please help to review the changes (1 line fix) for the following CR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8008647
The webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8008647/
The webrev doesn't show anything. The change is only adding a space on
usage between "-x" and "e
Francis,
Actually the test is updated in tl forest:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/d34c5e860d5f
But its still not merged to jdk8 forest. So, you can wait for a merge,
or you can clone the tl forest and get the updated test.
Aleksej
On 29.10.2013 22:41, Francis ANDRE wrote:
Hi Ale
Hi Aleksej
I run this command
FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/Z/JDK/jdk8/jdk
$ hg incoming
comparing with http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk
searching for changes
no changes found
and no recent changes were found... So, how do I get the latest version?
Francis
Le 29/10/2013 20:22, Alekse
Hello Francis,
The following test was modified [1] to address a time zone names changes
in JDK [2]. As I can see, you have an old version of this test. And just
FYI - this test will be removed in future.
Aleksej
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-October/022452.ht
Hi
I got this exception running the Bug6317929 test on a French WXP/Cygwin/VS2010
platform with jdk8 which I modified locally to print the getDispalyName. So I am
a little bit puzzled... What should be the proper result?
Currie.getDisplayName=Eastern Normalzeit (Neusüdwales)
Exception in thr
Thanks Masayoshi for the review. I will work with translator to refix
this bug.
thanks,
-michael
On 13年10月28日 11:03 下午, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
Should "[options]" and "alias..." in the second one be translated as
well?
{"Usage.jarsigner.options.jar.file.alias",
-"用法
Looks good to me.
Naoto
On 10/28/13, 10:47 PM, Michael Fang wrote:
Hello,
Please help to review the changes (1 line fix) for the following CR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025646
The webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8025646/
The change is in:
FROM -ve
Approved for jdk7u-dev.
I can push this changeset for you.
regards,
Sean.
On 29/10/2013 11:04, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hi,
Another additional information for records:
The test failure bug related to tzdata2013g update was approved for
jdk8 [1]. The changeset [2] contains both fixes for 8026772
Alan,
I want to keep this test until I'll came up with new regression test .
And I might will come up with some idea on this test modifications
instead of deletion. So thats why I put it to ProblemsList.txt instead
of deletion - some sort put it on hold with no impact to JDK 8 release
process.
On 24/10/2013 14:32, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Alan, Masayoshi, Michael,
If you agree with the proposed changes then we can proceed with
closing this bug. Can I ask you to sponsorship this change in such case?
The hg patch located here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8026772/8026772_jdk8.patc
Hi,
Another additional information for records:
The test failure bug related to tzdata2013g update was approved for
jdk8 [1]. The changeset [2] contains both fixes for 8026772 and 8025255.
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-October/022452.html
[2] http://cr.openjdk
15 matches
Mail list logo