Re: [Hugs] #84: Unnecessary "Control stack overflow"

#84: Unnecessary "Control stack overflow" -+-- Reporter: guest | Owner: nobody Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone:

[Hugs] #84: Unnecessary "Control stack overflow"

#84: Unnecessary "Control stack overflow" +--- Reporter: guest | Owner: nobody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone:

Re: [Hugs] #80: A curious stack overflow problem

#80: A curious stack overflow problem --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: nobody Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: hugs | Version: 200609

[Hugs] #80: A curious stack overflow problem

#80: A curious stack overflow problem +--- Reporter: guest | Owner: nobody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: hugs| Version: 200609 Keywords

Re: Stack overflow on words (repeat 'a')

i should have mentioned that Prelude.span is less strict, so: span p l = span' p l id where span' p [] = \c->c ([],[]) span' p xs@(x:xs') | p x = span' p xs' . (\c (a,b)->c (x:a,b)) | otherwise = \c->c ([],xs) -- Prelude.span fails, span succeeds test1 span = span (/=' ')

Re: Stack overflow on words (repeat 'a')

With the expression: words (repeat 'a') Using WinHugs Sep 06 I get a stack overflow. Using Hugs Linux May 06 I get a GC fails to reclaim sufficient space error Using GHC and Yhc both of these succeed. I have a similar issue in one of my functions which is showing the same

Stack overflow on words (repeat 'a')

Hi With the expression: words (repeat 'a') Using WinHugs Sep 06 I get a stack overflow. Using Hugs Linux May 06 I get a GC fails to reclaim sufficient space error Using GHC and Yhc both of these succeed. I have a similar issue in one of my functions which is showing the same

Re: winhugs crashes on C stack overflow

Hi there, thanks for the bug report. No, this wasn't a known one, WinHugs' evaluator thread didn't have an exception filter set up to catch the stack overflow. It does now, making the behaviour uniform across both versions of Hugs. --sigbjorn - Original Message - Fro

winhugs crashes on C stack overflow

Hi, I am new to Haskell and functional programming in general, but I think that I have found a bug in Winhugs. When I call "wurzel 5" in the "dos-mode"-hugs after loading the attached file I get "ERROR - C stack overflow", which is ok. Winhugs crashes in the same

C stack overflow (was: (no subject))

Hi, you don't say what version of Hugs you're using, nor on what platform, but when I run your repro code with the Dec 2001 release on a Win2k box, the garbage collector runs out of heap space & complains. There are programs (and heap sizes) for which the garbage collector will blow the C stack,

Re: stack overflow

Hi Gustav, Gustav> Hello, I think I've found a bug in Hugs 98 (February 2001 Gustav> version). Hugs crashes (Stack Overflow) whenever I try to Gustav> execute the following piece of code: Gustav> f a b = f (f' a b) b that's OK. Function f has two ba

stack overflow

Hello, I think I've found a bug in Hugs 98 (February 2001 version). Hugs crashes (Stack Overflow) whenever I try to execute the following piece of code (well I know, the code is not very useful, it came from a typo):   -- f :: Int -> Int -> Intf a b = f (f&

control stack overflow in hugs98

(both november 1999 and pre 201 releases) > module Main where > import Random > symbols i = take 1 $ drop 417 $ map show $ (randoms (mkStdGen i):: [Int]) > main = putStr $ show $ symbols 1 I was wondering why there's a control stack overflow, and whether I'm doing someth

Re: loop in infix read parser causes stack overflow

Klemens Hemm wrote: > > the :++ infix definition causes the derived read parser to loop until control stack >overflow in hugs may99. > > module Main where > > data T = T1 | T :++ T deriving (Eq,Show, Read) > > t :: T > t = read "T1" > >

loop in infix read parser causes stack overflow

the :++ infix definition causes the derived read parser to loop until control stack overflow in hugs may99. module Main where data T = T1 | T :++ T deriving (Eq,Show, Read) t :: T t = read "T1" main = print t Klemens

Re: "ERROR: Control stack overflow"

| Conal Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks: | > Re: ERROR: Control stack overflow | > Would it be reasonably easy for Hugs to give some more information in | > these situations? - Conal | | I think this would be pretty hard to do. | To make sense of the control stack, I think you

Re: "ERROR: Control stack overflow"

Conal Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks: > Re: ERROR: Control stack overflow > Would it be reasonably easy for Hugs to give some more information in > these situations? - Conal I think this would be pretty hard to do. To make sense of the control stack, I think you need to look

"ERROR: Control stack overflow"

Would it be reasonably easy for Hugs to give some more information in these situations? - Conal