2009/4/15 Dennis Daupert :
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Carl Franks wrote:
>>
>> Hope this helps!
>> Carl
>
> Yes, yes, yes! That does indeed. Thanks for making the extra effort, Carl. I
> learned some things here.
heh - no problem! :)
Carl
___
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Carl Franks wrote:
>
> Hope this helps!
> Carl
>
Yes, yes, yes! That does indeed. Thanks for making the extra effort, Carl. I
learned some things here.
/dennis
___
HTML-FormFu mailing list
HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.u
2009/4/14 Dennis Daupert :
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Carl Franks wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> If you checkout the test files from the HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC
>> distribution, I think these ones match the setups you want:
>>
>> t/update/many_to_many_select.t
>> t/update/many_to_many_se
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Carl Franks wrote:
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> If you checkout the test files from the HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC
> distribution, I think these ones match the setups you want:
>
> t/update/many_to_many_select.t
> t/update/many_to_many_select.yml
> t/default_values/has_many_sel
2009/4/14 Dennis Daupert :
> Finding my way around, I thought I'd ask for advice before getting myself in
> too much trouble ;-)
>
> I have several sets of parent / child / join tables in which both the
> "parent (has many and many-to-many)" and "child (belongs to)" tables are
> managed separately,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Moritz Onken wrote:
> Did you read the documentation of HTML::FormFu::Model::DBIC?
>
>
Yes, I did, as mentioned in this paragraph in my post:
In HTML::FormFu::Model::DBIC I see examples showing yaml configurations for
updating tables that are related to one anothe
Yes there is.
Did you read the documentation of HTML::FormFu::Model::DBIC?
moritz
Am 14.04.2009 um 04:45 schrieb Dennis Daupert:
Finding my way around, I thought I'd ask for advice before getting
myself in too much trouble ;-)
I have several sets of parent / child / join tables in which bo
Finding my way around, I thought I'd ask for advice before getting myself in
too much trouble ;-)
I have several sets of parent / child / join tables in which both the
"parent (has many and many-to-many)" and "child (belongs to)" tables are
managed separately, and only the join tables need to be u
