Re: [html-formfu] Re: date element required constraint

2007-08-10 Thread Carl Franks
On 10/08/07, Thorsten Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i just tried the latest version of the date element. In contrast to the prior > version it doesn't trigger the required constraint all the tiem, but now it > seems it does never trigger the required constraint :-( I'm going to need at the

[html-formfu] Re: date element required constraint

2007-08-10 Thread Thorsten Domsch
i just tried the latest version of the date element. In contrast to the prior version it doesn't trigger the required constraint all the tiem, but now it seems it does never trigger the required constraint :-( -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Mo

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-08-09 Thread Carl Franks
On 07/08/07, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How were you testing this? > > > > The file "t/elements/date.t" tests the Required constraint on a date > > element - it seems to work ok. > > Can you give the attached Catalyst app a spin? It marks the field as "Field is > required" even if

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-08-06 Thread Carl Franks
On 06/08/07, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.) By default there shouldn't be a valid date selected. The three select Some applications may wish to always set the default date itself - and not have an empty item at the start of each menu - thereby forcing the selection of a value. >

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-08-06 Thread Carl Franks
On 06/08/07, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've now checked in a new 'date' element. > > I've still got some more features to add to it, but it's got the basics > > down. > > Thanks very much. I gave it a spin and it already looks pretty good. Here's > some > quick feedback. > >

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-08-06 Thread Carl Franks
On 06/08/07, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks very much. I gave it a spin and it already looks pretty good. Here's > > some quick feedback. > > Some more feedback: > > I just realized that invalid dates (e.g. February, 31st) do not trigger an > error > message yet. Furthermore t

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-08-06 Thread Tobias Kremer
> Thanks very much. I gave it a spin and it already looks pretty good. Here's > some quick feedback. Some more feedback: I just realized that invalid dates (e.g. February, 31st) do not trigger an error message yet. Furthermore the Required Constraint doesn't work on date Elements. It seems to alw

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-08-06 Thread Tobias Kremer
Hi Carl, > I've now checked in a new 'date' element. > I've still got some more features to add to it, but it's got the basics down. Thanks very much. I gave it a spin and it already looks pretty good. Here's some quick feedback. 1.) The list of month names could be automatically set depending

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-08-02 Thread Carl Franks
On 18/07/07, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Carl, > > Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wondering why there still is no such thing as a Date element consisting > > of three select fields (day, month, year)? Am I the only person who doesn't > > like giving users a stupi

Re: [html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-07-18 Thread Carl Franks
On 18/07/07, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Carl, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm wondering why there still is no such thing as a Date element consisting > of three select fields (day, month, year)? Am I the only person who doesn't > like giving users a stupid textfie

[html-formfu] Re: Date Element

2007-07-18 Thread Tobias Kremer
Hi Carl, Tobias Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm wondering why there still is no such thing as a Date element consisting > of three select fields (day, month, year)? Am I the only person who doesn't > like giving users a stupid textfield for entering dates? I don't like > JavaScript popup c