Re: [Hol-info] Tracking lemmas used by REWRITE_CONV

2018-01-31 Thread Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro
On 31/01/18 10:37, Yaqing Jiang wrote: > Thanks for the information. I'll check this in HOL Light. You are welcome. Please address replies to messages in a mailing list to the mailing list, unless there is some special reason for not to. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---

Re: [Hol-info] Tracking lemmas used by REWRITE_CONV

2018-01-31 Thread Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro
On 31/01/18 06:49, Yaqing Jiang wrote: > Anyone knows if there is a simple way of finding out which theorems were > actually applied? In HOL4 you can do “set_trace "simplifier" 2;” (or an higher value) to display information about how the term is being rewritten by simpLib (it is a more general fa

Re: [Hol-info] Tracking lemmas used by REWRITE_CONV

2018-01-31 Thread Mark Adams
Hi Yaqing, I could enhance my Tactician tool to do this sort of thing. In fact, a new release is long overdue, so I'll try to find the time to do this soon (but am too busy in the next few weeks). But you say you're looking for a quick patch. One approach would be to apply the original con

[Hol-info] Tracking lemmas used by REWRITE_CONV

2018-01-31 Thread Yaqing Jiang
Sometimes when I'm using REWRITE_CONV[th1;th2...] to rewrite a term, not all the theorems in th1,th2,... are used. Anyone knows if there is a simple way of finding out which theorems were actually applied? I know there are methods that tracking the entire dependencies of a proven theorem, bu