Re: [Hol-info] MATCH_MP_TAC and canonical implication form

2019-02-28 Thread Haitao Zhang
ses implicational theorems like this first, and then > basically applies MATCH_MP_TAC. > > > > Michael > > > > *From: *Haitao Zhang > *Date: *Friday, 1 March 2019 at 11:03 > *To: *hol-info > *Subject: *[Hol-info] MATCH_MP_TAC and canonical implication form > >

[Hol-info] MATCH_MP_TAC and canonical implication form

2019-02-28 Thread Haitao Zhang
I have a theorem that is in a form like !x y z. a ==> b ==> c ==> d and I would like to match d to the goal. It seems that I need to convert all the antecedents into a conjunction first. I can (UNDISCH_ALL o SPEC_ALL) to move everything to the assumptions. But how do I get the conjunctions of all t