ke I'll
need to dig deeper. My plan would be to create the checksum code
automatically depending on the 'versionability' of the properties.
If this sounds useful/sane I am happy to work on a patch.
Regards,
Tom
___
hibernate-
the issue
during product demonstrations to potential customers, hence the urgency on
our end to see the issue resolved.
Cheers,
Tom
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Sanne, the unit test doesn't make any assertions, so I don't know how useful
it would be as a test. It allows a user to view the Hibernate-generated
SQL, illustrating the entities loaded.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> thanks for the reminder
ented()
returns false).
Any other ideas on how I can tell if a lazy property has been initialized?
Tom
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> 2011/3/21 Tom Waterhouse :
> > Sanne, the unit test doesn't make any assertions, so I don't know how
> useful
&g
#x27;m not sure what the Hibernate development testing methodology
is, but my suggestion would be to create a unit test of
processCollectionEvent with mocks as necessary.
Tom
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> sorry, copy
he library used
for the test. I don't know that mocks have been used to this point for
Hibernate Search testing. Mockito/mocking is acceptable?
You can see the test I created as an attachment to HSEARCH-679.
Tom
___
hibernate-dev mailing lis
that is
palatable then I will leave the test as-is and introduce Mockito as a
dependency.
Tom
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Most tests in HSearch are more integration / functional tests than true
> unit tests. Since we can tests everything wi
underlying database at runtime?
Thanks in advance, Tom
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Sanne,
I've added a comment to HSEARCH-679 that includes the instructions necessary
to add the attached unit test to the hibernate-search code base. Let me
know if you need anything more to check in the fix for HSEARCH-679.
Tom
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Tom Waterhouse wrote:
&g
FullTextIndexEventListener as
suggested below
3) fixed - ooops!
The tests are attached to HSEARCH-679 as HSEARCH-679-test-updated.
Tom
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> thank you, I'm playing with it right now.
>
> As I mentioned on JIRA, the main reason for w
If a person wanted to start down the road of adding MongoDB support for OMG,
where would the best place to start be?
Tom
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Outstanding, this is a good list. I'll jump in head-first and see what
happens (probably lots of bumps and bruises, of course...).
Cheers,
Tom
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> If such person existed, that would be awesome :)
>
> H
ration. A
lock is never able to be obtained, see the stack from a thread dump below.
The same MassIndexer call works fine when using FSDirectoryProvider.
Should MassIndexer work with Infinispan as the directory?
Tom
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping)
at java.lang.Thread.sl
rations work as expected. It is
only the MassIndexer that has had trouble to this point.
Tom
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> the MassIndexer needs to acquire the Directory lock, which is in this
> case distributed, i.e. it's a single lock to coor
oLoadObjects(30);
massIndexer.threadsForSubsequentFetching(8);
massIndexer.threadsToLoadObjects(4);
logger.info("starting MassIndexer");
massIndexer.startAndWait();
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> I've cr
Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Tom Waterhouse wrote:
> I set a breakpoint inside of org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(long) and
> noticed something peculiar - the method is called twice. The first call
> succeeds, the second fails, my guess because the first call obtained the
> lock.
A testcase would help; as pointed out in my previous mail I've written
> one and found no issues, so please help me reproducing the issue. You
> could also open an issue and attach both your Infinispan and Search
> configurations.
>
> Regards,
> Sanne
>
> 2011/8/29 T
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HSEARCH-893
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> 2011/8/31 Tom Waterhouse :
> > I have a test case available. In the test case a
> > org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException instance is thrown.
> >
> &g
I've searched the boards for a while and seen a few
posts alluding to the same issue but never a conclusive answer. The
application - swing rich client on a single user local db. In this
situation I think a session-per-application is desirable. If I load an entity,
say the contact
Tried that :
http://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?t=965080
no reply.
If this is not the correct channel for this follow up apologies and
would somebody indicate the correct one please.
Thanks, Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Great, thanks for the help...
-Original Message-
From: Christian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 25 September 2006 10:17 AM
To: Tom Hughes
Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] session-per-application in a rich client an
antipattern?
On Sep 25
I'm working with the org.hibernate.id.enhanced.TableGenerator class and I've
noticed a couple of shortcomings (imho). First and foremost, it creates one row
in the hibernate_sequences table for each configured segment_value (as opposed
to one row for each "target_table" as implemented within the
I apologize if this is a 2nd posting.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Muldoon
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:04 AM
To: 'hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org'
Subject: [hibernate-dev] Short
23 matches
Mail list logo