Re: [hibernate-dev] CDI related issue

2018-08-16 Thread Guillaume Smet
Thanks! ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] BlobProxy, Reducing the amount of Proxies we rely on at runtime

2018-08-16 Thread Sanne Grinovero
Hi Steve, thanks for confirming all that. There's of course some risk that future JDBC drivers will break things, but there's no breaking change in any version 9,10,11,12 ; I believe it's unlikely and even if there's need for working around a breaking change, we could evaluate various options. We

[hibernate-dev] Releasing Hibernate ORM 5.2.18.Final?

2018-08-16 Thread Guillaume Smet
Hi, So, it's been a long time since we last released the ORM 5.2 branch and some people are asking about it, some of them with good reasons not to upgrade to 5.3. I think we are making it something big because we wanted it to be THE last 5.2 release and this ends up in it not being released at al

Re: [hibernate-dev] Releasing Hibernate ORM 5.2.18.Final?

2018-08-16 Thread Sanne Grinovero
It's never realistic to say "it's THE last ..." so I guess I agree we can show a bit of flexibility - but people should not get used to it, we can not re-establish a plan of regular releases from 5.2. We have to severely limit the time we can dedicate to it. Also please make sure people are motiva

Re: [hibernate-dev] Releasing Hibernate ORM 5.2.18.Final?

2018-08-16 Thread Guillaume Smet
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:05 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote: > It's never realistic to say "it's THE last ..." so I guess I agree we > can show a bit of flexibility - but people should not get used to it, > we can not re-establish a plan of regular releases from 5.2. > Sure, that's not what I suggest.

Re: [hibernate-dev] Releasing Hibernate ORM 5.2.18.Final?

2018-08-16 Thread Sanne Grinovero
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Guillaume Smet wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:05 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> >> It's never realistic to say "it's THE last ..." so I guess I agree we >> can show a bit of flexibility - but people should not get used to it, >> we can not re-establish a plan of