In some cases - maybe not these specifically - I know people ask your
review when it gets tricky, as you're the most thorough reviewer and
have deep knowledge of most areas :) Maybe that was the case, maybe
not. Good to clarify either way.
Thanks!
Sanne
On 30 January 2018 at 00:59, Gail Badner
If it's a matter of reviewing code, I'm happy to help. In that case, my
name should be added as a reviewer.
BTW, I forget to check all the various ways I can be contacted, so a
personal email or hipchat message. helps.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> In some cases - ma
Wanted to remind everyone that tomorrow is the next time-boxed release for
5.3.
I wanted to get everyone's opinions about the version number, whether this
should be Beta2 or CR1. IMO It depends how you view the remaining
challenges with the JPA TCK, with CR1 being the optimistic view.
___
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Steve Ebersole
wrote:
> Wanted to remind everyone that tomorrow is the next time-boxed release for
> 5.3.
>
> I wanted to get everyone's opinions about the version number, whether this
> should be Beta2 or CR1. IMO It depends how you view the remaining
> challen
WildFly would like to have a version of 5.3+, that is compatible with ORM
5.1, with regard to the org.hibernate.session changes (including mapping of
exceptions thrown, so that the same exceptions are thrown).
Is it even possible to have an extra org.hibernate.Session interface + impl
(bridge) tha
