I run a quick Google search for "Hibernate NnativeQuery stored procedure"
and found these links:
http://www.baeldung.com/stored-procedures-with-hibernate-tutorial
https://www.mkyong.com/hibernate/how-to-call-store-procedure-in-hibernate/
I guess people used to do this. We could use some QueryHin
I fixed it with the following commit:
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/commit/871722dc08ec131cd1f5238e1b48df8db2dcc402
Let me know if it's more clear now.
Vlad
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Gail Badner wrote:
> OK, I'll make sure Hibernate also treats an empty array element as
>
Hey,
@Vlad: if they eventually have to adjust their code, why is it so hard to
use the proper API for calling stored procedures?
I'm supporting Steve's idea to remove this complexity and force the users
to use the proper API. I think for 6.0 this change can be acceptable and
should be mentioned i
If we make this change, we need to make sure the StoredProcedureQuery works
properly for functions too:
https://vladmihalcea.com/2016/04/27/how-to-call-sql-server-stored-procedures-and-functions-from-hibernate/
Currently, it only supports stored procedures and not database functions.
However, use
+1 for removing it
On 27 July 2017 at 10:54, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
> If we make this change, we need to make sure the StoredProcedureQuery works
> properly for functions too:
>
> https://vladmihalcea.com/2016/04/27/how-to-call-sql-server-
> stored-procedures-and-functions-from-hibernate/
>
> Curr
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused with the mentioned lock mode.
*The doc says the following:*
*"The entity is locked pessimistically and its version is incremented
automatically even if the entity has not changed."*
I'm checking this with an H2 DB and the current behavior is the following:
- the versio
Vlad, we have had this discussion like 5 times now ;)
http://www.mail-archive.com/hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org/msg13885.html ->
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10530
The ProcedureCall support for this is already mostly in place. Using your
post example e.g., you'd do something like:
I think that is still confusing. I'd suggest something like:
When discussing arrays, it is important to understand the distinction
between SQL array types and Java arrays that are mapped as part of the
application's domain model.
Not all databases implement the SQL-99 ARRAY type and, for this r
Without looking at the complete passage in Vald's article, I will say that
the single phrase you pulled out of that context is not accurate IMO
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, 12:01 PM Arnold Gálovics
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a bit confused with the mentioned lock mode.
>
> *The doc says the following:*
>
