Hi,
I noticed there is a 5.0.1 version in JIRA for OGM, and a handful of issues
are assigned to it. Do we still plan to do such 5.0.1, or is everyone
focused on the first preview for 5.1 right now?
There is one interesting issue in 5.0.1 which alone I'd find worth
releasing: OGM-828 ("Need to lis
+1 keep those releases coming!
and yes those fixes need to be made available better sooner than later.
On 24 Jun 2016 09:14, "Gunnar Morling" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed there is a 5.0.1 version in JIRA for OGM, and a handful of issues
> are assigned to it. Do we still plan to do such 5.0.1, or is
Sounds good to me
Davide
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> +1 keep those releases coming!
> and yes those fixes need to be made available better sooner than later.
> On 24 Jun 2016 09:14, "Gunnar Morling" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed there is a 5.0.1 version in JIRA
Cool; Anyone volunteering for doing the release?
2016-06-24 11:59 GMT+02:00 Davide D'Alto :
> Sounds good to me
>
> Davide
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
> > +1 keep those releases coming!
> > and yes those fixes need to be made available better sooner than later.
I definitely want it run regularly (i.e. not "just before a release"). I'd
be ok with it being nightly. That's why I asked in the first place.
Everyone who responded +1'd to it being on-each-push. I really don't
care. I tend to agree it should be nightly, but I only get one vote :)
So the one
I worked on this some more today and wanted to pass along a few high-points
I started to see emerge...
The idea of "Type scoping" is very important and central. The basic idea
is to have a single point for the creation and caching of Type instances.
Specifically this Scope would define just 2 met
On 24 June 2016 at 16:40, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I definitely want it run regularly (i.e. not "just before a release"). I'd
> be ok with it being nightly. That's why I asked in the first place.
> Everyone who responded +1'd to it being on-each-push. I really don't care.
> I tend to agree it sh
That's it, thanks!
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:13 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 24 June 2016 at 16:40, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > I definitely want it run regularly (i.e. not "just before a release").
> I'd
> > be ok with it being nightly. That's why I asked in the first place.
> > Everyone who
Steve,
I still need to look at the wiki page and will give more detailed feedback
on some parts of it.
One general thing coming to mind though is how support for OGM could be
improved. On first thought I'd say the "Java side" of Type might stay as
is, but the "SQL side" (or "datastore side") and
This is all part of the to-be-decided read/write part of the new Type
contract. I propose, as discussed in the wiki, that we have Type return
ValueExtractor and ValueBinder for read/write. So assuming that is there...
One possible answer to your story is that OGM as a SQM interpreter and
Metamod
10 matches
Mail list logo
