Anyone know what is up with this Javadoc tool failure in these jobs? We've
had the same failure for the last few builds...
-- Forwarded message -
From: Hibernate CI
Date: Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:09 AM
Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: hibernate-orm-master-h2 #1316
To: ,
See
I could replicate it on my local machine too:
javadoc: error - java.lang.ClassCastException:
com.sun.tools.javadoc.MethodDocImpl cannot be cast to
com.sun.tools.javadoc.AnnotationTypeElementDocImpl
:documentation:aggregateJavadocs FAILED
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/44853/why-am-i-getting-a
the failure is caused by the javadoc of
AvailabeSettings#GLOBALLY_QUOTED_IDENTIFIERS_SKIP_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS
I'm fixing it
On 26 January 2016 at 15:55, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
> I could replicate it on my local machine too:
>
> javadoc: error - java.lang.ClassCastException:
> com.sun.tools.javadoc.
Hello all,
I'm thrilled to announce that there is now Eclipse tooling available
to help developers using Hibernate Search.
This was created by Dmitry Bocharov, started this summer as a GSOC
summer of code and still volunteering on it.
Better described in his own words on our blog:
- http://in.re
Yes, I just found that too. But what specifically? I found it by brute
force lol
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:07 AM andrea boriero wrote:
> the failure is caused by the javadoc of
> AvailabeSettings#GLOBALLY_QUOTED_IDENTIFIERS_SKIP_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS
> I'm fixing it
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 15
This has come up again under HHH-10345[1].
The original request here claims that Oracle have deprecated LONG (
LONGVARCHAR) and LONG RAW (LONGVARBINARY). It refers to the 9i release
notes as "proof" of that[2]. The 9i release notes do mention LONG
(LONGVARCHAR)
datatype being deprecated. Howeve
Awesome! Congrats everyone, very exciting!
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:11 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'm thrilled to announce that there is now Eclipse tooling available
> to help developers using Hibernate Search.
>
> This was created by Dmitry Bocharov, started this summer as a G
the only solution i found is to use
{@link javax.persistence.Column @Column(columnDefinition="...")}
and {@link javax.persistence.JoinColumn @JoinColumn(columnDefinition="..."}
but I wasn't able to find why it fails with
{@link javax.persistence.Column @Column#columnDefinition()} and {@link
jav
Hi,
Hibernate provides simple configuration properties to enable batch inserts
and updates using "hibernate.order_inserts" and "hibernate.order_updates"
respectively. These setting allow hibernate to sort the insert and update
statements and process them in batches efficiently.
But we don't have
I think it's a Java bug because the same Javadoc entry is found in the
org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.env.spi.IdentifierHelper interface:
/**
* Intended only for use in handling quoting requirements for {@code
column-definition}
* as defined by {@link javax.persistence.Column#columnDefinition()},
*
This must be done like insert but in reverse order. With inserts, we need
to add parents first and children after, because of the foreign key
constraints.
For delete, we need to group children first and delete them prior to
deleting parents.
Is there something that prevents us from implementing th
11 matches
Mail list logo